•Extensive management engagement with potential and existing shareholders

EXECUTIVE ~~COMPENSATION~~COMPENSATION BEST PRACTICES

We annually evaluate all elements of ~~our named~~ executive ~~officers (“NEOs”)~~officers’ pay to ensure alignment with performance objectives, market best practices and stockholder interests. The following summarizes our ~~current~~compensation practices.


What We Do
✓						Pay for performance by providing the majority of senior executive compensation in the form of variable cash incentives and equity awards tied to meeting performance goals ~~and increasing our share price~~
✓						Establish challenging performance goals in incentive plans
✓						Require non-competition agreement for equity award eligibility
✓						Provide limited executive perquisites
✓						Discourage excessive risk-taking and encourage long-term decision-making with our compensation programs, in alignment with the interests of our shareholders
✓						Review executive compensation levels and practices relative to our peer group and relevant survey data
✓						Use an outside independent compensation consultant engaged directly by the CNG Committee to advise on executive compensation matters
✓						Subject executives’ cash and equity-based incentive compensation to clawback
✓						Maintain stock ownership guidelines for executive officers and directors


What We Don’t Do
X						Provide automatic salary increases for our executives in their employment agreements
X						Maintain supplemental executive retirement plans for our executives
X						Pay dividends on unearned performance-based equity awards
X						Provide excise tax gross-ups
X						Allow hedging or pledging of company securities
X						Reprice or exchange underwater stock options without shareholder approval

Table of Contents

~~Proposal~~

PROPOSAL 1: ~~election of directors~~

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Our Board of Directors is presently comprised of eight directors, divided into three classes serving staggered three-year terms. The term of the Class I directors expires at our ~~2021~~2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the term of the Class II directors expires at our ~~2022~~2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and the term of the Class III directors expires at our ~~2023~~2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The current members of each class of directors isare as follows:

•Class I directors: ~~Thomas Degnan,~~ Helen Golding, ~~and~~ Allen Hugli

and Christine Montenegro McGrath

•Class II directors: Gregory Cole and Ann Ziegler

•Class III directors: Marla Gottschalk, Lance Mitchell and Richard Noll

We have entered into a Stockholders Agreement (the “Stockholders Agreement”) with Packaging Finance Limited (“PFL”) which, among other things, provides that PFL has the right to nominate all of our directors so long as the Hart Entities (as defined in the Stockholders Agreement) beneficially own at least 50% of the outstanding shares of our common stock; a majority of our directors so long as they own at least 40% of our stock; and at least one director so long as they own at least 10% of our stock. Currently, PFL has the right to nominate all of our directors, and all of our directors were nominated by, and may be removed by, PFL. Based on the recommendation of the Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “CNG Committee”) and designated by PFL, the Board has nominated ~~Thomas Degnan,~~ Helen Golding, ~~and~~ Allen Hugli and Christine Montenegro McGrath for election as directors at the ~~2021 annual meeting,~~2024 Annual Meeting, to serve until the ~~2024~~2027 annual meeting of stockholders.

Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than three, the number of nominees named in this ~~proxy~~ ~~statement~~.Proxy Statement. We expect each nominee for election as a director will be able to serve if elected. If any nominee is not able to serve, proxies will be voted in favor of the remainder of those nominated and may be voted for substitute nominees.

Set forth below is biographical information as of March ~~31, 2021,~~1, 2024, for the nominees and each person whose term of office as a director will continue after the Annual Meeting. There are no family relationships among our executive officers or directors.

Table of Contents


Gregory Cole
~~Gregory Cole~~
	Age: 58 60 Director Since: October 2019 Class II Committees: •Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (Chair) Mr. Cole ~~been a member of the Company’s Board of Directors since October 2019 and is a member of the CNG Committee. Mr. Cole was a member of the Audit Committee from January 2020 to January 2021 and~~ currently serves as a senior executive and a director of Rank Group Limited (“Rank” or “Rank Group”) and a director of other entities owned by Mr. Graeme Hart. He has been a senior executive of Rank since 2004. He is a director of our controlling shareholder, PFL. From 1994 to 2004, Mr. Cole was a partner with Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, which he joined in 1986. Mr. Cole received a Bachelor of Commerce from the University of Auckland. Mr. Cole brings to the Board valuable perspective and insight with respect to the Company’s business, industry, challenges, and opportunities as a result of his years serving in a variety of senior executive positions for Rank.

Helen Golding

~~Thomas Degnan~~
	Age: 73 61 Director Since: October 2019 Class I Committees: •Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee ~~(Chair)~~ Mr. Degnan has been a member of the Company’s Board of Directors since October 2019 and is the Chair of the CNG Committee. In January 2021 he retired from Pactiv Evergreen Inc. (“PEI”, previously known as Reynolds Group Holdings Limited “RGHL”), where he served as a director and the Chief Executive Officer of RGHL since 2007. Mr. Degnan received a B.A. from Loyola University of Chicago. ~~Mr. Degnan~~ brings to the Board valuable perspective and insight with respect to the business, industry, challenges, and opportunities as a result of his years serving as Chief Executive Officer of the Company’s former parent company, RGHL.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Helen Golding~~

~~Age:~~ 58

~~Director Since:~~ ~~October 2019~~

~~Class I~~

~~Committees:~~ ~~None~~

Ms. Golding ~~has been a member of the Company’s Board of Directors since October 2019. She~~ is a director of our controlling shareholder, PFL, and currently serves as Group Legal Counsel and a director of Rank and a director of other entities owned by Mr. Graeme Hart. She has been a senior executive of Rank since 2006. Ms. Golding joined Rank from Burns, Philp & Company Pty Limited where she served as Company Secretary and Group Legal Counsel from 1998 to 2006. Prior to that, she was a private practitioner in a Sydney-based law firm. Ms. Golding received a Bachelor of Economics and Master of Laws from the University of Sydney.

Ms. Golding brings to the Board valuable perspective and insight with respect to the Company’s business, industry, challenges, and opportunities as a result of her years serving as Group Legal Counsel for Rank.

Table of Contents

Marla Gottschalk

Age: 60

Director Since: January 2020

Class III

Committees:

•Audit Committee (Chair)

Ms. Gottschalk ~~has been a member of the Company’s Board of Directors since January 2020 and is the Chair of the Audit Committee. Ms. Gottschalk previously~~ served as the Chief Executive Officer of The Pampered Chef Ltd. from 2006 to 2013 and as President and Chief Operating Officer from 2003 to 2006. Ms. Gottschalk joined Pampered Chef from Kraft Foods, Inc., where she worked for 14 years in various management positions, including as Senior Vice President of Financial Planning and Investor Relations for Kraft, Executive Vice President and General Manager of Post Cereal Division and Vice President of Marketing and Strategy of the Kraft Cheese Division. Ms. Gottschalk is currently a member of the board of directors of ~~Potbelly Corporation and~~ Big Lots, Inc., where she serves as the chair of ~~their~~the audit ~~committees~~committee and as a member of ~~their~~the compensation ~~committees.~~committee and nominating and governance committee. She also serves ~~as a strategic~~on the board ~~advisor~~of directors for ~~Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc.~~US Foods Holding Corp. where she serves on the audit committee and nominating and governance committee. She also serves as a member of the board of directors of ~~Underwriters Laboratories.~~UL Inc., where she chairs the nominating and governance committee and is a member of the human capital and compensation committee. Ms. Gottschalk previously served as a director of Potbelly Corporation from 2009 to 2022. Ms. Gottschalk received a B.S. in Business from Indiana University and a Masters in Management Studies from Northwestern University’s J.L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management.

Ms. Gottschalk brings to the Board qualifications that include her extensive experience with global companies, her expertise in the consumer products industry and her years of experience in operations and strategic management.

~~Table of Contents~~

Allen Hugli

Age: 58

Director Since: March 2021

Class I

Committees: None

Mr. Hugli ~~has served as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors since March 2021. He~~ is a director of our controlling shareholder, PFL, and currently serves as Chief Financial Officer and a director of Rank, a director of ~~PEI~~Pactiv Evergreen Inc. (“PEI”) where he also served as the Chief Financial Officer from 2009 to 2020, and a director of other entities owned by Mr. Graeme Hart. He has been a senior executive of Rank since 1993. Mr. Hugli previously held positions in financial management and audit practices in Australia, Canada and New Zealand. Mr. Hugli received a Bachelor of Commerce (Honours) from Queen’s University at Kingston. Mr. Hugli holds a CPA CA designation from the Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada.

Mr. Hugli brings to the Board valuable perspective and insight with respect to the Company’s business, industry, challenges, and opportunities as a result of his years serving as Chief Financial Officer and a director of ~~Rank~~.

Rank.

Table of Contents


Christine Montenegro McGrath
			Age: 58 Director Since: September2023 Class I Committees: •Audit Committee Ms. McGrath has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Impact & Sustainability Officer with Mondelez International since 2021. Prior to her current position, Ms. McGrath served in various other leadership roles at Mondelez since 2012, including more recently Vice President and Chief of Global Impact, Sustainability & Mindful Snacking. Ms. McGrath joined Mondelez from Kraft Foods, Inc., where she worked from 1989 to 2012 in various management positions in brand management, product innovation and corporate initiatives, including serving as Vice President of Global Sustainability and Vice President Latino Centre of Excellence. Prior to this, Ms. McGrath was a Senior Auditor with Arthur Andersen & Co. from 1987 to 1989. Ms. McGrath received her Bachelor of Science, Accounting and Philosophy, from Boston College, School of Management in the Honors Program, and her Master of Management, Marketing and Strategy, from Northwestern University, J.L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management. Ms. McGrath also received an Honorary Doctorate in Business Administration from Boston College. Ms. McGrath brings to the Board qualifications in senior leadership positions that include her extensive experience with global companies, expertise in the consumer products industry and years of experience in sustainability and ESG-related corporate governance, reporting and disclosures, as well as marketing and strategic management.
Lance Mitchell
			Age: 61 64 Director Since: October 2019 Class III Committees: None Mr. Mitchell has served as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer since 2011 and as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors since October 2019. From ~~2006~~2005 to 2011, Mr. Mitchell served as President of Closure Systems International (part of PEI and its subsidiaries (“PEI Group”) from 2008 to 2019). Mr. Mitchell commenced his career in sales and marketing at Owens Corning, ~~Fiberglass,~~ progressed to General Management positions at Avery Dennison and Goodrich followed by executive management positions at PolyOne and Alcoa before joining PEI Group in 2008. Mr. Mitchell received a B.S. in Business from Bowling Green State University. Mr. Mitchell brings to the Board valuable perspective and insight with respect to the business, industry, challenges, and opportunities as a result of his years serving as the senior executive officer of the Company. Mr. Mitchell also represents management’s perspective on important matters to the Board.

Table of Contents


Richard Noll

~~Richard Noll~~
	Age:63 66 Director Since:January 2020 Non-Executive Chairman of the Board Since:January 2020 Class III Committees: •~~Audit Committee~~ • Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee ~~Mr. Noll has served as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors since January 2020 and is a member of the Audit Committee and the CNG Committee.~~ Mr. Noll served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Hanesbrands Inc. from 2009 to 2019 and Chief Executive Officer from 2006 to 2016. Mr. Noll joined Hanesbrands Inc. from Sara Lee Corporation where he worked for 14 years in various management positions, including President and Chief Operating Officer of Branded Apparel and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer of Sara Lee Bakery Group, and led the turnarounds of several Sara Lee Corporation bakery and apparel businesses. Within the past five years, Mr. Noll ~~is currently~~served as a member of the board of directors of Carter’s Inc., where he ~~serves~~served as a member of its compensation committee from 2019 to 2021 and as a member of the board of directors of Jack Creek Investment Corp., from 2021 to January 2023, where he ~~serves~~served as a member of its audit ~~compensation and nominating committees.~~committee, which he chaired beginning in 2022. Mr. Noll previously served as a member of the board of directors of Neighbor Inc. from 2020 to January 2024 and as a director of Fresh Market Inc. from 2011 to 2016. Mr. Noll received a B.A. in Business Administration from Pennsylvania State University and an M.B.A. from Carnegie Mellon University. Mr. Noll brings to the Board broad experience with business issues applicable to the success of a publicly-traded company, including a controlled company, and the consumer packaged goods industry after his experience and holding senior leadership positions at Hanesbrands Inc.

Table of Contents


Ann Ziegler
~~Ann Ziegler~~
	Age: 62 65 Director Since: September 2020 Class II Committees: •Audit Committee ~~Ms. Ziegler has served as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors since September 2020 and is a member of the Audit Committee.~~ Ms. Ziegler served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CDW Corporation, a technology solutions provider, from 2008 to 2017. From 2005 to 2008, Ms. Ziegler served as Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, Administration of Sara Lee Food & Beverage, a division of Sara Lee Corporation, a global consumer goods company. From 2003 to 2005, Ms. Ziegler served as Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, Administration of Sara Lee Bakery Group. From 1993 to 2003, Ms. Ziegler served in various corporate development and legal positions at Sara Lee. Prior to joining Sara Lee, Ms. Ziegler was a corporate attorney at the law firm of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom. Ms. Ziegler is currently a member of the board of directors of ~~Hanesbrands Inc., where she serves as a chair of its compensation committee and a member of its nominating and governance committee, a member of the board of directors of~~ US Foods Holding ~~Corp, where she serves as a member of its audit~~Corp. and ~~compensation committees, and a member of the board of directors of~~ Wolters ~~Kluwer, where she serves as a vice chair and member of the selection and remuneration committee.~~Kluwer. During the past five years, Ms. Ziegler also served on the board of directors of Groupon, Inc. and Hanesbrands, Inc. Ms. Ziegler received a B.A. in Economics and Government from The College of William and Mary and a J.D. from University of Chicago Law School. Ms. Ziegler brings to the Board experience in senior leadership positions with companies in the consumer products industry, including with corporate risk management issues, and preparing or overseeing the preparation of financial statements. She has experience in corporate governance through service as a director of other public companies.

Board of Directors’ Recommendation

The proposal for the election of directors relates solely to the election of the directors nominated by the Board of Directors.

The Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote FOR the election of
the three director nominees, ~~Thomas Degnan,~~ Helen Golding, Allen Hugli and ~~Allen Hugli.~~

Christine Montenegro McGrath.

Table of Contents

CORPORATE G~~OVERNANCE~~

GOVERNANCE

Director Independence

We are a “controlled company” under the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”). As a result, we qualify for exemptions from, and have elected not to comply with, certain corporate governance requirements under the rules, including the requirements that ~~within one year of the closing of our initial public offering (“IPO”)~~ we have a Board that is composed of a majority of “independent directors,” as defined under the Nasdaq rules, and a compensation and nominating committee that is composed entirely of independent directors.

Even though we are a controlled company, we are required to comply with the rules of the SEC and Nasdaq relating to the membership, qualifications and operations of the Audit Committee. As a newly-public company, we were able to, and did, rely on an exemption from the requirement that all members of the Audit Committee be independent directors for a period of one year after our IPO, and Mr. Cole, a non-independent director, served on the Audit Committee from the date of our IPO until January 27, 2021. Currently, allAll members of the Audit Committee are independent directors.

Our Board of Directors has determined that Ms. Gottschalk, Ms. McGrath, Mr. Noll and Ms. Ziegler are independent directors under Nasdaq rules. In making such independence determination, the Board of Directors considered the relationships that each such non-employee director has with our Company and all other facts and circumstances that the Board of Directors deemed relevant in determining their independence.

Board Leadership Structure

The positions of our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer are presently separated. Separating these positions allows our Chief Executive Officer to focus on our day-to-day business, while allowing the Chairman of the Board to lead the Board of Directors in its fundamental role of providing advice to, and oversight of, management. Our Board of Directors recognizes the time, effort and energy that the Chief Executive Officer must devote to his position in the current business environment, as well as the commitment required to serve as our Chairman, particularly as the Board of Directors’ oversight responsibilities continue to grow. Our Board of Directors also believes that this structure ensures a greater role for the non-management directors in the oversight of our Company and active participation of the independent directors in setting agendas and establishing priorities and procedures for the work of our Board of Directors. Although our ~~By-Laws~~Bylaws and Corporate Governance Guidelines do not require our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer positions to be separate, our Board of Directors believes that having separate positions is the appropriate leadership structure for the Company at this time.

Stockholder Communications

A shareholder or other interested party may submit a written communication to the Board of Directors by sending it to the Board in care of Corporate Secretary at Reynolds Consumer Products, 1900 West Field Court, Lake Forest, IL 60045 Attention: Corporate Secretary. The Corporate Secretary will send copies of all communications to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and, when appropriate, to all Board members.

Table of Contents

Procedures for Selecting and Nominating Director Candidates

The CNG Committee Charter ~~adopted in 2020 provides:~~

~~The~~provides that the CNG Committee ~~shall oversee searches for~~shall:

•Determine the qualifications, qualities, skills and ~~identify qualified individuals for membership on the Board.~~

~~The CNG Committee shall~~other expertise required to be a director and develop, and recommend to the Board for its approval, criteria to be considered in selecting nominees for director (the “Director Criteria”).

•Evaluate the current composition, organization and governance of the Board and make appropriate recommendations on such matters to the Board ~~committee membership~~for approval, consistent with the Director Criteria.

•Search for, identify, evaluate and ~~shall~~ recommend ~~individuals~~for selection by the Board candidates for membership on the Board, including in the case of newly-created positions or vacancies on the Board and ~~its committees.~~review any candidates that are recommended by stockholders in compliance with the Company’s certificate of incorporation, bylaws and stockholder nomination and recommendation policies and procedures, applicable law and any applicable stockholders agreement. In making its recommendations for Board and committee membership, the Committee shall:

~~Table~~

◦review candidates’ qualifications for membership on the Board or a committee of ~~Contents~~

review candidates’ qualifications for membership on the Board or a committee of the Board (including making a specific determination as to the independence of each candidate) based on the criteria approved by the Board (and taking into account the enhanced independence, financial literacy and financial expertise standards that may be required under law or Nasdaq rules for Audit Committee or other committee membership purposes);

the Board based on the Director Criteria;

~~in evaluating current directors for re-nomination to the Board or re-appointment to any Board committees, assess the performance of such directors;~~

◦consider any other factors that are set forth in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines or are deemed appropriate by the CNG Committee or the Board;

periodically review the composition of the Board and its committees in light of the current challenges and needs of the Board, the Company and each committee, and determine whether it may be appropriate to add or remove individuals after considering issues of judgment, diversity, age, skills, background and experience;

◦assess the performance of current directors being evaluated for renomination to the Board; and

periodically review, as appropriate, the service of all directors on the boards of other public companies with consideration to the substantial time commitment required of directors and make such recommendations to the Board as it may deem advisable;

◦periodically review, as appropriate, the service of all directors on the boards of other public companies with consideration to the substantial time commitment required of directors and make such recommendations to the Board as it may deem advisable.

~~consider rotation of committee members and committee chairs, as appropriate; and~~

•Recommend for selection by the Board the director nominees (by class, if the Board is classified at the time of the recommendation), to stand for election to the Board by the stockholders at any meeting of stockholders at which directors are to be elected.

~~consider any other factors that are set forth in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines or are deemed appropriate by the CNG Committee or the Board.~~

•Consider the Board’s leadership structure, including the separation of the chair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer roles and/or appointment of a lead independent director of the Board, either permanently or for specific purposes, and make such recommendations with respect thereto as the CNG Committee deems appropriate.

•Develop and review periodically the Company’s policies and procedures for considering stockholder nominees for election to the Board.

•Evaluate the performance of individual members of the Board and, if appropriate, recommend termination of membership of individual directors for cause or for other appropriate reasons.

•Evaluate the “independence” of directors and director nominees against the independence requirements of Nasdaq and the Exchange Act, and the regulations promulgated thereunder.

Pursuant to the Stockholders Agreement between the Company and PFL, PFL has the right to nominate all of our directors so long as the Hart Entities (as defined in the Stockholders Agreement) beneficially own at least 50% of the outstanding shares of our common stock; a majority of our directors so long as they own at least 40% of our stock; and at least one director so long as they own at least 10% of our stock. Currently, PFL has the right to nominate all of our directors, and all of our directors were nominated by, and may be removed by, PFL.

Table of Contents

The Company’s Bylaws include provisions for nomination and election of directors at the annual meeting of stockholders and requirements for director nominees.

The CNG Committee will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders in the same manner that it considers all director candidates. Stockholders who wish to suggest qualified candidates should write to Reynolds Consumer Products, 1900 West Field Court, Lake Forest, IL 60045 Attention: Corporate Secretary. Any such recommendation should include a description of the candidate’s qualifications for board service; the candidate’s written consent to be considered for nomination and to serve if nominated and elected; and addresses and telephone numbers for contacting the stockholder and the candidate for more information.

Board Meetings and Committees

Our Board of Directors held ~~seven~~six meetings during ~~2020.~~2023. The independent directors regularly hold executive sessions at meetings of the Board of Directors. During ~~2020,~~2023, each of the directors then in office attended at least 75% of the aggregate of all meetings of the Board of Directors and all meetings of the committees of the Board of Directors on which such director then served. Directors are encouraged to attend the annual meetings of stockholders of the Company, as provided in our Corporate Governance Guidelines.

All of our directors who were directors at the time of our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders attended that meeting.

During ~~2020,~~2023, our Board of Directors had two standing committees: the Audit Committee and the CNG Committee. The following sets forth a summary of the responsibilities of each of the committees and the membership of each of our committees as of March ~~31, 2021:~~

1, 2024.


~~Audit Committee~~		~~Compensation, Nominating and~~ ~~Corporate Governance Committee~~
~~Marla Gottschalk (Chair)~~		~~Thomas Degnan (Chair)~~
~~Richard Noll~~		~~Gregory Cole~~
~~Ann Ziegler~~		~~Richard Noll~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Audit Committee

The members of our Audit Committee are Ms. Gottschalk (Chair), ~~Mr. Noll~~Ms. McGrath and Ms. Ziegler. The composition of our Audit Committee meets the requirements for independence under the current Nasdaq listing standards and SEC rules and regulations. Each member of our Audit Committee is financially literate. In addition, our ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors has determined that Ms. Gottschalk is an “Audit Committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). This designation does not impose any duties, obligations or liabilities that are greater than are generally imposed on members of our Audit Committee and our ~~board~~Board of ~~directors.~~Directors. Our Audit Committee is directly responsible for, among other things:

•selecting a firm to serve as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements;

•ensuring the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm;

•approving the planned scope and timing, and discussing the findings, of the audit with the independent registered public accounting firm, and reviewing, with management and that firm, our interim and year-end operating ~~results;~~

results, including engaging with that firm to understand the nature of each identified critical audit matter, the basis for identifying a matter as a critical audit matter and how each such identified matter will be described in the firm’s audit report;

•review and discuss with management and any independent registered public accounting firm any climate-related and other environmental disclosures to be made by the Company, including any attestation or other assurance to be provided by such firm;

•establishing procedures for employees to anonymously submit concerns about questionable accounting or auditing matters;

•considering the adequacy of our internal controls and internal audit function;

Table of Contents

•reviewing policies and practices with respect to risk assessment and risk management, and discussing with management major financial risk exposures and the steps that have been taken to monitor and control such exposures, including review of enterprise risk, legal liabilities, cybersecurity related risks and threats, fraud assessments, climate risks and privacy, data security and business continuity risk exposures;

•reviewing and approving related person transactions and those that require disclosure; and

•approving or, as permitted, pre-approving all audit and non-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm.

The Audit Committee held four meetings during ~~2020.~~2023. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter approved by the Board, a copy of which is available in the “Investors—Corporate Governance—Documents and Charters” section of our website at ~~www.reynoldsconsumerproducts.com~~www.ReynoldsConsumerProducts.com.

Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The members of our CNG Committee are Mr. ~~Degnan~~Cole (Chair), ~~Mr. Cole~~Ms. Golding and Mr. Noll. Our CNG Committee is responsible for, among other things:

•determining, or recommending to our ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors for determination, the compensation of our executive officers;

•reviewing and approving the compensation of our directors;

•administering our stock and equity incentive plans;

•reviewing and evaluating, or making recommendations to our ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors with respect to, incentive compensation and equity plans;

•reviewing management succession plans;

•reviewing our overall compensation philosophy;

~~Table~~

•identifying and recommending candidates for membership on our Board of ~~Contents~~

•

~~identifying and recommending candidates for membership on our board of directors;~~

Directors;

•reviewing and recommending our corporate governance guidelines and policies;

•reviewing and considering proposed waivers of the code of conduct for directors and executive officers and making recommendations to our ~~board~~Board of ~~directors;~~

Directors;

•overseeing the process of evaluating the performance of our ~~board~~Board of ~~directors;~~Directors; and

•assisting our ~~board~~Board of ~~directors~~Directors on corporate governance ~~matters.~~

matters, including reviewing stockholder proposals and certain proxy and Form 10-K disclosures related to corporate governance.

The CNG Committee held five meetings during ~~2020.~~2023. The CNG Committee operates under a written charter approved by the Board, a copy of which is available in the “Investors—Corporate Governance—Documents and Charters” section of our website at ~~www.reynoldsconsumerproducts.com~~www.ReynoldsConsumerProducts.com.

Table of Contents

Risk Oversight

Our Board of Directors oversees the management of risks inherent in the operation of our business and the implementation of our business strategies. Our Board of Directors performs this oversight role by using several different levels of review. In connection with its reviews of the operations and corporate functions of our Company, our Board of Directors addresses the primary risks associated with those operations and corporate functions. In addition, our Board of Directors reviews the risks associated with our Company’s business strategies periodically throughout the year as part of its consideration of undertaking any such business strategies.

Each of our Board committees also coordinates oversight of the management of our risk that falls within the committee’s areas of responsibility. In performing this function, each committee has full access to management, as well as the ability to engage advisors. Our Chief Financial Officer is responsible for identifying, evaluating and implementing risk management controls and methodologies to address any identified risks. In connection with its risk management role, our Audit Committee meets privately with representatives from our independent registered public accounting firm, and privately with our Chief Financial Officer. In addition, the CNG Committee reviews the Company’s compensation program and risk elements to the Company in connection with the structure of the compensation plan.

Board Evaluations

The ~~Company intends to implement a~~ Board of Directors conducts an annual Board evaluation ~~process in 2021.~~

process. Per the Board’s direction, the Corporate Secretary prepares self-evaluation questionnaires for each of the Board, the Audit Committee and the CNG Committee. All Board and Committee members complete the evaluations. The Corporate Secretary then compiles the results of the evaluations and provides the compilations to the respective Chairs. During the executive session of their regularly scheduled October meetings, each Chair reviewed the results of the evaluations and the members discussed.

Environmental, Social & Governance Matters

Management recognizes the importance of Environmental, Social & Governance matters to all stakeholders and has reviewed and discussed with the Board the Company’s development of its Environmental, Social & Governance framework. In 2023, the Board appointed Christine Montenegro McGrath to the Board of Directors and appointed her to the Audit Committee. Ms. McGrath brings to the Board extensive experience in sustainability and expertise in the consumer products industry.

Management ~~will continue to provide~~provides regular updates to the Board ~~while~~regarding Environmental, Social & Governance matters, and also ~~providing~~provides regular updates to Company stakeholders. Additional information about the Company’s Environmental, Social & Governance actions, goals and initiatives is included in our ~~2020~~2023 Annual Report to Stockholders, which is being provided as part of the proxy materials and is available on our corporate website at ~~www.reynoldsconsumerproducts.com.~~

www.ReynoldsConsumerProducts.com.

Table of Contents

DIRECTOR ~~COMPENSATION~~

~~Beginning in 2020,~~COMPENSATION

During 2023, our directors who are not employees of our company or of Rank Group ~~or PEI~~ (the “non-affiliated directors”) (Mr. Noll, Ms. Gottschalk, Ms. McGrath and Ms. Ziegler) received ~~the following~~ annual retainers and annual equity compensation ~~grants:~~

grants pursuant to the following program:

•Board member: ~~$230,000,~~$245,000, of which $100,000 iswas an annual cash retainer and ~~$130,000 is~~$145,000 was in the form of an annual grant of restricted stock units (“RSUs”).

•Chairman of the Board: $115,000, of which $50,000 iswas an annual cash retainer and $65,000 iswas in the form of an annual grant of RSUs, in addition to the ~~$230,000~~$245,000 in board member payments and grants described above.

~~Chairs~~•Chair of our Audit Committee ~~and our CNG Committee~~: $20,000, as an annual cash retainer.

•Members of our Audit Committee and our CNG Committee ~~(other than the Chairman of the Board)~~: $10,000, as an annual cash retainer.

RSUs are granted pursuant to the Reynolds Consumer Products Inc. Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Incentive Plan”) and the number of RSUs granted is calculated by dividing the applicable dollar value by the closing sale price per share of our common stock on the date of grant. The RSUs granted in ~~2020~~2023 to ~~our non-affiliated directors~~each of Ms. Gottschalk, Mr. Noll, and Ms. Ziegler were granted ~~to Ms. Gottschalk~~on April 26, 2023, the date of our 2023 annual meeting, and ~~Mr. Noll on March 5, 2020 and vested~~will vest in full on the earlier of the first anniversary ~~thereof, and were~~of the grant date or immediately prior to the following year’s annual meeting of stockholders. The RSUs granted ~~on a prorated amount~~ to Ms. ~~Ziegler on September 22, 2020~~McGrath when she was appointed to the Board on September 25, 2023, were in a prorated amount and will vest in full on the first anniversary ~~thereof.~~

~~We plan~~of the date of grant.

Beginning in 2023, non-affiliated directors were able to ~~grant~~elect to defer the settlement of their RSUs ~~and make~~for a period of time after the ~~annual~~RSUs vest, either upon cessation of their service as a director or a later date following the cessation of their service as a director.

For 2023, the cash retainer ~~payments~~amounts were paid to non-affiliated directors on April 26, 2023, except for Ms. McGrath, who received her retainers in October 2023 in the amount of $26,849 (prorated for the period from September 25, 2023 to December 31, 2023) for serving on the Board and $2,685 (prorated for the period from September 25, 2023 to December 31, 2023) for serving on the Audit Committee.

Beginning in 2024, the cash retainer amounts that are paid to non-affiliated directors will be paid in quarterly installments on or about the first day of January, April, July and October rather than in a lump sum payment on the date of the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders in each year, beginning in 2022. For 2021, as a transition year, the RSUs were granted, and the cash retainer amounts (adjusted to reflect standardizing payment dates, moving Mr. Degnan and Ms. Ziegler from January to April and Ms. Gottschalk and Mr. Noll from February to April) were paid, to non-affiliated directors (Mr. Degnan, Mr. Noll, Ms. Gottschalk and Ms. Ziegler) on April 1, 2021. The RSUs will vest in full on April 1, 2022, subject to continued service.

meeting.

Directors who are also full-time officers or employees of the Company receive no additional compensation for serving as directors. An individual who is a non-employee director may not receive awards, in cash or otherwise, for any calendar year that total more than $750,000 in the aggregate.

We also reimburse all of our directors for their reasonable expenses incurred in attending meetings of our Board of Directors or committees, and have entered into Indemnification Agreements with our directors.

Table of Contents

STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

We have adopted Stock Ownership Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) applicable to our non-affiliated directors that became effective on July 1, 2023. Under the Guidelines, each non-affiliated director is expected to own shares of our common stock with a value at least equal to five times the annual Board cash retainer (not including any chair or committee retainers). Shares owned directly and indirectly, as well as full-value equity awards (such as RSUs) with only a time-based vesting condition, count toward the ownership level under the Guidelines. Stock options (if any were to be granted by the Company) do not count toward the ownership level under the Guidelines.

The applicable ownership level is to be achieved by our directors within the later of July 1, 2028 (five years after the effective date of the Guidelines) or five years following when he or she becomes subject to the Guidelines (such date, the “Compliance Date”). Prior to the first applicable Compliance Date, until a non-affiliated director has satisfied the applicable level of ownership, he or she is required to retain not less than 50% of the net shares received (shares received after any shares are withheld to satisfy applicable withholding taxes) from the vesting or settlement of any equity award granted after the effective date of the Guidelines. As of and following the first applicable Compliance Date, if the applicable level of ownership has not been achieved, or if it has been achieved but a non-affiliated director falls below the applicable level of ownership, he or she will be required to retain 100% of the net shares received from the vesting or settlement of any equity award granted until the applicable level of ownership is achieved.

2023 Director Compensation Table

The following table presents the compensation for each person who served as a member of our Board of Directors during ~~2020,~~2023, other than Mr. Mitchell. Mr. Mitchell, who is also our Chief Executive Officer, receives no compensation for his service as a director. The compensation received by Mr. Mitchell as our Chief Executive Officer during ~~2020~~2023 is presented in the ~~2020~~ Summary Compensation Table. Mr. Cole, ~~Mr. Degnan and~~ Ms. Golding and Mr. Hugli did not receive any compensation for his or her service as a director of ours in ~~2020,~~2023, due to the fact that they were serving as officers of Rank Group ~~or PEI~~ at the time of payment or grant.


	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash		Stock Awards		All Other Compensation		Total
Name	($)		($)⁽¹⁾		($)⁽²⁾		($)
Gregory Cole	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Helen Golding		—		—		—		—
Marla Gottschalk		120,000		145,008		4,008		269,016
Allen Hugli		—		—		—		—
Christine Montenegro McGrath		29,534		85,014		—		114,548
Richard Noll		170,000		209,990		6,012		386,002
Ann Ziegler		110,000		145,008		4,008		259,016

(1)The number of unvested RSUs held by each director at December 31, 2023 was: Mr. Cole: zero; Ms. Golding: zero; Ms. Gottschalk: 5,273; Mr. Hugli: zero; Mr. Noll: 7,636; Ms. McGrath: 3,274; and Ms. Ziegler: 5,273.

(2)The amounts in this column represent the dollar value of dividend equivalents paid in 2023 related to RSUs held by the director.

Table of Contents

~~2020~~ ~~Director Compensation Table~~

Fees Earned
or Paid in Cash

Stock Awards

Total

Name

($)

($)⁽¹⁾

($)

Gregory Cole

$
—

$
—

$
—

Thomas Degnan

—

—

—

Helen Golding

—

—

—

Marla Gottschalk

130,000

130,007

260,007

Richard Noll

150,000

194,995

344,995

Ann Ziegler

27,500

43,339

70,839

PROPOSAL 2: APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO OUR AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO ALLOW FOR EXCULPATION OF OFFICERS AS PERMITTED BY DELAWARE LAW

~~(1)~~

~~The number of unvested RSUs held by each director at December 31, 2020 was: Mr. Cole: zero; Mr. Degnan: zero; Ms. Golding: zero; Ms. Gottschalk: 4,335; Mr. Noll: 6,502; and Ms. Ziegler: 1,362.~~

The Board has unanimously approved and declared advisable, and recommends that our stockholders approve, an amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to allow for exculpation of officers as permitted by Delaware law (the “Charter Amendment”).

The State of Delaware, which is the Company’s state of incorporation, recently amended Section 102(b)(7) of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) to authorize Delaware corporations to adopt a provision in their certificate of incorporation to eliminate or limit monetary liability of certain corporate officers for breach of the fiduciary duty of care. Previously, the DGCL allowed only exculpation of directors for breach of the fiduciary duty of care. As amended, Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL authorizes corporations to provide for exculpation of the following officers: (i) the corporation’s president, chief executive officer, chief operating officer, chief financial officer, chief legal officer, controller, treasurer or chief accounting officer, (ii) “named executive officers” identified in the corporation’s SEC filings, and (iii) other individuals who have agreed to be identified as officers of the corporation for purposes of service of process.

Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL, as amended, only permits, and therefore Charter Amendment would only permit, the exculpation of those certain officers for claims that do not involve breaches of the duty of loyalty, acts or omissions not in good faith or that involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, or any transaction in which the officer derived an improper personal benefit. In addition, under the Charter Amendment, the exculpation of officers would not apply to claims brought by or in the right of the Company, such as derivative claims.

In considering whether to propose the Charter Amendment, the Board considered that the role of an officer (like the role of a director) requires time-sensitive decision-making on critical matters which can create substantial risk of investigations, claims, actions, lawsuits, or proceedings seeking to impose liability on the basis of hindsight, especially in the current litigious environment and regardless of merit. The Board believes the Charter Amendment better aligns the protections available to the Company’s officers with those currently available to the Company’s directors and would avoid the risk of officers being added to direct claims relating to breaches of the duty of care, which can lead to increased litigation and insurance costs. In addition, the Board believes that the Charter Amendment would better position the Company to continue to attract and retain top executive talent by providing protection against the potential exposure to liabilities and costs of defense tied to such claims. For those reasons, and taking into account the limits on the types of claims for which officers’ liability would be exculpated, the Board determined that approval of the Charter Amendment to allow for exculpation of certain of the Company’s officers is advisable and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Table of Contents

Text of Proposed Charter Amendment

Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation currently provides for the exculpation of directors and does not include a provision allowing for the exculpation of officers. We propose to amend Section (A), Limited Liability, of Article 8, Indemnification, of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation so that it would state in its entirety as follows (with additions shown as underlined):

“(A)Limited Liability. A director or an officer of the Corporation shall not be personally liable to the Corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director or an officer, to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware Law as the same exists or as may hereafter be amended from time to time.”

Timing and Effect of the Charter Amendment

Other than the replacement of the existing Section (A), Limited Liability, of Article 8, Indemnification by the proposed Section (A), Limited Liability, of Article 8, Indemnification, the remainder of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation will remain unchanged. If the Charter Amendment is approved by the stockholders, the amendment will become effective upon filing of a Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the Delaware Secretary of State, which the Company anticipates filing promptly following the Annual Meeting.

Board of Directors’ Recommendation

The Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote FOR approval of the amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to allow for exculpation of officers as permitted by Delaware law.

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 2:3: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF IN~~DEPENDENT~~INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, ~~2021.~~2024. Our Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote for ratification of this appointment. If this proposal is not approved at the Annual Meeting, the Audit Committee will reconsider its appointment, but may decide not to ~~direct the appointment of~~appoint a different independent registered public accounting firm. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee may, in its discretion, ~~direct the appointment of~~appoint a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee determines that such a change would be in our stockholders’ best interests.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has audited our financial statements for each year since 2015. We expect representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to be present at the Annual Meeting and available to respond to appropriate questions. They will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so.

Board of Directors’ Recommendation

The Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote FOR ratification of the appointment of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, ~~2021.~~

~~AUDIT MATTERS~~

~~Auditor Fees~~

2024.

AUDITOR FEES

The following table presents fees for professional audit services rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the years ended December 31, ~~2020~~2023 and ~~2019:~~

2022:

2020

2019

(in thousands)

Audit Fees

$
2,300

$
3,606

All Other Fees

360

—

Total

$
2,660

$
3,606

~~The~~


	2023		2022
	(in thousands)
Audit Fees⁽¹⁾	$	2,440	$	3,000
Audit-Related Fees⁽²⁾		150		425
Tax Fees		—		—
All Other Fees		—		—
Total	$	2,590	$	3,425

(1)Audit Fees for ~~2020~~2023 and 2022 were for professional services rendered for the audits of the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements and quarterly consolidated financial statements. ~~The All Other Fees for 2020~~

(2)Audit-related fees were for ~~an internal control design assessment project. The Audit Fees for 2019 were for professional services rendered for the audits of the Company’s annual combined financial statements~~a Form S-3 filing on May 23, 2022 and quarterly combined financial statements. In addition, 2019 also included audit fees for professional services rendered in relation to the review of our registration statement and other documents filed with the SEC.

comfort letter procedures.

All ~~audit~~ services rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in ~~2020~~2023 and ~~2019~~2022 were approved by the Audit Committee, which considered whether the provision of all services was compatible with maintaining PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s independence.

Table of Contents ~~Pre-Approval Policy~~

PRE-APPROVAL POLICY

The Audit Committee has adopted a policy with respect to pre-approval of certain types of audit and non-audit related services specifically described by the Audit Committee on an annual basis. In general, the Audit Committee has pre-approved the provision of certain audit services and audit-related services, in each case up to an annual amount which varies by the type of services. Individual engagements anticipated to exceed such pre-established thresholds must be

~~Table of Contents~~

separately approved. This policy also sets forth certain services that the Company’s independent public accountant is prohibited from providing to the Company. The policy authorizes the Audit Committee to delegate to one or more of its members pre-approval authority with respect to permitted services.

All services provided and fees charged by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to us were pre-approved in accordance with the policy described above.

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, ~~2020.~~2023. The Audit Committee has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the matters that are required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and the SEC. The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and the Audit Committee has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP that firm’s independence. The Audit ~~committee~~Committee has concluded that PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s provision of audit and non-audit services to the company and its affiliates is compatible with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s independence.

Based on the reviews and discussions described above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2020~~2023 for filing with the SEC.

Audit Committee

Marla Gottschalk, Chair

~~Richard Noll~~

Christine Montenegro McGrath

Ann Ziegler

Table of Contents

~~Proposal 3: advisory vote to approve the compensation of the named executive officers~~

PROPOSAL 4: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF THE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

We are providing our stockholders the opportunity to cast an advisory (non-binding) vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. Consistent with the preference expressed by our stockholders at the 2021 annual meeting of stockholders, we are conducting say-on-pay votes on an annual basis.

As described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”), we have designed the compensation arrangements for our named executive officers to provide compensation in overall amounts and in forms that attract and retain talented and experienced individuals and motivate our executive officers to achieve the goals that are important to our growth. Our Board and CNG Committee believe that our executive compensation program is tied to performance, aligns with shareholder interests and merits stockholder support. Accordingly, the Board recommends that stockholders vote in favor of the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and the narrative discussion contained in this ~~proxy statement.~~Proxy Statement.”

Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding on the Board of Directors or the CNG Committee. However, the Board of Directors and the CNG Committee will carefully review the voting results. To the extent there is any significant negative vote on this proposal, we may consult directly with stockholders to better understand the concerns that influenced the vote.

Board of Directors’ Recommendation

The Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote FOR the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers.

Table of Contents

~~Proposal 4: advisory vote to~~ ~~Determine frequency~~ ~~of future advisory votes on executive compensation~~

We are providing our stockholders the opportunity to cast an advisory (non-binding) vote regarding the desired frequency for holding future non-binding advisory votes to approve the compensation of our named executive officers as described in our annual proxy statement.

This proposal gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views as to whether say-on-pay votes should occur every one, two or three years. Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding on the Board of Directors. However, the Board will carefully consider the outcome of the frequency vote and other communications from stockholders when making future decisions regarding the frequency of say-on-pay votes.

After careful consideration, the Board of Directors believes that submitting the advisory vote on executive compensation to stockholders on an annual basis is the most appropriate alternative at this time.

~~The proxy card provides stockholders with four choices (every one, two or three years, or abstain).~~

~~Board of Directors’ Recommendation~~

~~The Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote for a frequency of ONE YEAR for future advisory votes on executive compensation.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

EXECUTIVE CO~~MPENSATION~~

COMPENSATION

The following provides information about our executive ~~officers.~~

officers, as of March 1, 2024.

Name

Age

~~Age~~

Position

Lance Mitchell

President and Chief Executive Officer

~~Michael Graham~~

Scott Huckins

Chief Financial Officer

Rachel Bishop

President, Hefty Tableware

Judith Buckner

~~President, Presto Products~~

~~Craig Cappel~~

President, Reynolds Cooking & Baking

Lisa Smith

President, Hefty Waste and Storage

Christopher Corey

President, Presto Products

Stephan Pace

President, Sales and Chief Customer Officer

Chris Mayrhofer

Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller

Steve Estes

Chief Administrative Officer

Rita Fisher

Chief Information Officer and Executive Vice President, Supply Chain

Michael McMahon

Senior Vice President, Key Accounts Sales

Valerie Miller

Executive Vice President of Human Resources

David Watson

Legal Counsel and Corporate Secretary

Nathan Lowe

Vice President, Financial Planning & Analysis

Mark Swartzberg

Vice President, Investor Relations

Lance Mitchell

Mr. Mitchell has served as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer since 2011 and as a member of the Company’s ~~Board~~board of ~~Directors~~directors since October 2019. From ~~2006~~2005 to 2011, Mr. Mitchell served as President of Closure Systems International (part of PEI Group from 2008 to 2019). Mr. Mitchell commenced his career in sales and marketing at Owens ~~Corning Fiberglass,~~Corning. progressed to General Management positions at Avery Dennison and Goodrich followed by executive management positions at PolyOne and Alcoa before joining PEI Group in 2008. Mr. Mitchell received a B.S. in Business from Bowling Green State University.

~~Michael Graham~~

Scott Huckins

Mr. ~~Graham~~Huckins has served as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer since ~~2016.~~November 2023. Prior to joining the Company in October 2023, Mr. ~~Graham joined RCP after serving~~Huckins served as the CFO of ~~Graham Packaging (part of PEI Group)~~SunOpta, Inc. from ~~2011~~2019 to ~~2016. Prior to joining Graham Packaging,~~October 2023. Mr. ~~Graham led and managed several merger and integration activities for~~ ~~PEI~~ ~~and~~Huckins previously served as CFO of ~~Reynolds Packaging~~Claire’s Stores Inc. from 2016 to 2019. Prior to Claire’s, Mr. Huckins was with Sears Holdings from 2012 to 2016 where he served in the roles of Vice President – Treasurer and as President – Sears Reinsurance Company, Ltd., a captive reinsurance company operating in Bermuda. Mr. Huckins also served as Vice President – Treasury, Tax, and Investor Relations at RCS Holdings, Inc. from 2010 to 2012. He formerly served as Principal at Pioneer Advisors from 2008 to ~~2010, collaboratively leading~~2009. From 2001 to 2008, Mr. Huckins served in senior leadership roles at Koch Industries Inc. and affiliated companies, including as President & CEO of Koch Financial Products, LLC, CFO of the ~~integration~~Capital Markets Division, Treasurer of ~~Reynolds Packaging into RGHL. Mr. Graham served as Group Controller~~Koch Industries Inc., and CFO of ~~Alcoa’s Flat Rolled & Extruded Aluminum Group from 2004 to 2007. From 1986 to 2003~~KoSa B.V. Mr. ~~Graham served in~~Huckins holds a ~~variety~~Bachelor of ~~management positions at Honeywell International Inc. and AlliedSignal, Avaya Communications and General Mills, Inc. Mr. Graham received a B.A.~~Science in Finance from ~~Howard University.~~

Arizona State University and earned a Master of Management, with concentrations in Finance and Management Strategy, from Northwestern University, J.L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management.

Table of Contents

Rachel Bishop

Ms. Bishop has served as the Company’s President of Hefty Tableware since 2019. Prior to joining ~~RCP,~~the Company, she served as Chief Strategy Officer ~~from 2014 to 2017~~ and President, Snacks ~~from 2017 to 2019~~ at TreeHouse Foods, Inc. Ms. Bishop was ~~at The Walgreen Company from 2009 to 2014 where she most recently served as~~previously Group Vice President of Retail ~~Strategy. From 2001 to 2009, Ms. Bishop was~~Strategy at the Walgreen Company and began her business career at McKinsey & Company, where she worked with consumer businesses on a broad range of sales, marketing, and operational ~~topics with a focus on growth strategy development and implementation.~~topics. Ms. Bishop has served as a board member of Sally Beauty Holdings since 2022. Ms. Bishop earned a B.S. degrees in Materials Science and Engineering and in Geophysics from Brown University and a ~~Ph.D.~~Ph.D in Materials Science and Engineering with a minor in Technology Management from Northwestern University.

Judith Buckner

Ms. Buckner has served as the Company’s President of ~~Presto Products~~Reynolds Cooking & Baking since ~~2019.~~November 2022. She previously served as the Company’s President of Presto Products from 2019 to November 2022 and Senior Vice President, Business Transformation of ~~RCP~~the Company from 2017 to 2019. Ms. Buckner first joined ~~RCP~~the Company in 2000 as an Engineering Manager and has held various other leadership roles including Director of Manufacturing, Plant Manager, Director of Engineering and New Product Development and Vice President of Operations and Engineering. Her prior experience includes various engineering and leadership roles in product development and operations at Hoechst-Celanese/Invista from 1991 to 2000. Ms. Buckner earned a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Purdue University.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Craig Cappel~~

Mr. Cappel has served as the Company’s President of Reynolds Cooking & Baking since 2018. From 2015 to 2018, he served as President of Hefty Tableware. From 2013 to 2015, Mr. Cappel served as the Chief Procurement and Technology Officer for ~~PEI Group,~~ leading global sourcing and technology across multiple businesses. From 1997 to 2013, Mr. Cappel was with Pactiv as Vice President of Business Development and Innovation and various other leadership roles across innovation, engineering technology, new business development and business management. From 1994 to 1997, he served as an engineer at TE Connectivity, Ltd. (formerly Amp Incorporated). Mr. Cappel received a B.S. from the College of Engineering Technology at the Rochester Institute of Technology and an M.S. in Product Design and Development Management from Northwestern University.

Lisa Smith

Ms. Smith has served as the Company’s President of the Hefty Waste & Storage business since 2020. She previously served as Senior Vice President of Marketing for the Reynolds Cooking & Baking business since 2018, and prior to that was Vice President of Marketing for the Hefty Waste & Storage business from 2015 to 2018. Ms. Smith first joined the Company in 2009. Her prior experience includes holding marketing, sales and category management roles at CPG organizations including Mars, Sara Lee and Sunstar/GUM. Ms. Smith earned a B.S. in Marketing from the University of Illinois and an MBA from the J.L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University.

Christopher Corey

Mr. Corey has served as the Company’s President of Presto Products since November 2022. He previously served as Senior Vice President, International and Canada of the Company from 2019 until November 2022. His prior experience in CPG leadership includes roles at Kraft Heinz, Boehringer Ingelheim Consumer Healthcare, and Johnson & Johnson. Mr. Corey earned a Bachelor in Finance from the University of New Mexico and an MBA in Marketing from the Thunderbird School of Global Management.

Stephan Pace

Mr. Pace has served as the Company’s President, Sales and Chief Customer Officer, since 2020. Prior to this role, he served as ~~RCP’s~~the Company’s President of Walmart/Sam’s and eCommerce since 2015 and ~~RCP’s~~the Company’s Chief Customer Officer and Senior Vice President of Sales beginning in 2010. He served as Vice President of Sales for Pactiv’s Consumer Products Division prior to PEI’s acquisition of Pactiv in 2010. Mr. Pace joined Pactiv in 2001 and held several senior management positions. Prior to joining Pactiv, he served in a variety of sales and marketing roles at Unilever plc and Procter & Gamble Company. Mr. Pace received a B.A. in Economics from Wesleyan University. ~~He serves on the Board~~

Table of ~~Advisors for Tierra Nueva Fine Cocoa, d/b/a The Whole Coffee Company.~~

Contents

Chris Mayrhofer

Mr. Mayrhofer has served as the Company’s Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller since January 1, 2021 and as the Principal Accounting Officer since April 22, 2020. He previously served as Vice President and Controller for the Company from July 15, 2019 to January 1, 2021. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Mayrhofer served as Vice President and Corporate Controller of Evergreen Packaging from 2017 to July 2019, Vice President and Corporate Controller of Graham Packaging from 2012 to 2017 and, prior to that, held various financial ~~positons~~positions with PEI Group from 2009 to 2012, Performance Food Group Company from 2005 to 2009 and Ernst & Young LLP. He holds a ~~Bachelor’s~~Bachelor of Business Administration in Accounting from the University of Richmond and is a Certified Public Accountant.

Steve Estes

Mr. Estes joined the Company in January 2021 as its first Chief Administrative Officer, leading Business Transformation, EHS, HR, Legal, Procurement and Operational Excellence. He has 23 years of experience with Rank Group-owned companies, including his most recent role as Chief Human Resources Officer, Rank Group. He previously served as Vice President Human Resources, Rank Group, promoted from his role as, Vice President of Human Resources, Evergreen Packaging. He also served in Human Resources and safety roles at International Paper, Mattel, Inc., and Bruce Hardwood Floors. Mr. Estes earned a BBA in HR Management from Freed-Hardeman University and an MBA from Georgia Southern University.

Rita Fisher

Ms. Fisher has served as the Company’s Chief Information Officer and Executive Vice President, Supply Chain since August 2017. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Fisher served as Vice President and Head of Global Business Services for Kraft Heinz. During her 22 years at Kraft Heinz, she held many global and regional roles in Information Technology and Supply Chain, including Head of Global IT and Senior Director Supply Chain Transformation. Ms. Fisher started her career at People’s Gas Company as a Senior Business Analyst. Currently, Ms. Fisher is a member of the board of directors of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. Ms. Fisher earned a B.S. in Mathematics and Computer Science from the University of Illinois at Chicago and an M.S. in Computer Science from DePaul University.

Michael McMahon

Mr. McMahon has served as Senior Vice President, Key Accounts Sales since April 2015. Prior to that he served as Vice President of the Non Foods/Club Channel from November 2012 to March 2015. He joined Pactiv in 2006 as Director Category Management, and moved to the Company following PEI’s 2010 acquisition of Pactiv. Prior to that he had twenty years of sales experience at Kraft Foods, in roles including Senior Director of Category Planning. Mr. McMahon earned a B.A. in Marketing and Management from Olivet College, Michigan.

Valerie Miller

Ms. Miller has served as the Executive Vice President of Human Resources since January 2021 and as Vice President of Human Resources since October 2019. Prior to that, she served as the Senior Director of Human Resources from April 2017 to September 2019, and in various other Human Resources roles with the Company since 2012. Before that, she held various Human Resources leadership positions with Graham Packaging. Ms. Miller earned her B.A. in Business Administration from Carthage College and an MBA from University Wisconsin at Milwaukee.

Table of Contents

David Watson

Mr. Watson has served as Legal Counsel of the Company since February 2015, and as Corporate Secretary since January 31, 2020. Prior to that, he served as General Counsel and in various other legal roles with the Company since July 2009. Prior to that, he held chief legal officer positions with several public and private companies. Mr. Watson earned a B.S. in Business Administration from the University of Illinois and a J.D. from University of Illinois College of Law.

Nathan Lowe

Mr. Lowe has served as the Company’s Vice President of Financial Planning & Analysis since January 2021. Prior to that, he served as the Senior Director of Financial Planning & Analysis from January 2019 to December 2020. Mr. Lowe joined the Company after serving as Assistant Corporate Controller and Treasurer of GEC Packaging Technologies (part of PEI Group) from 2016 to 2018, and Financial Controller of Americold Logistics LLC’s international business from 2015 to 2016. From 2006 to 2015, Mr. Lowe was at KPMG both in Australia and USA, where he worked primarily with consumer and industrial businesses providing a range of audit and advisory services. He holds a Bachelor of Commerce and Accounting and Bachelor of Applied Finance from Macquarie University and is a Chartered Accountant.

Mark Swartzberg

Mr. Swartzberg has served as Vice President of Investor Relations since April 2020. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Swartzberg served as Vice President of Investor Relations of Molson Coors from 2018 to 2020, and prior to that held various securities analyst positions with Stifel Nicolaus from 2002 to 2018, ABN AMRO Bank N.V. from 2000 to 2002, and Smith Barney from 1998 to 2000. Mr. Swartzberg earned a B.A. in History and Political Science from Duke University and an MBA from Harvard Business School.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Introduction

This CD&A describes our compensation approach and programs for our ~~NEOs,~~named executive officers (“NEOs”), which ~~include our~~consist of the following persons for 2023:

•Lance Mitchell, President and Chief Executive Officer

•Scott Huckins, Chief Financial Officer

•Rachel Bishop, President, Hefty Tableware

•Judith Buckner, President, Reynolds Cooking & Baking

•Lisa Smith, President, Hefty Waste and Storage

•Michael Graham, who served as Chief Financial Officer until November 13, 2023

As previously disclosed, effective November 13, 2023, Scott Huckins succeeded Michael Graham as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, who previously announced his planned retirement from the Company. Effective upon Mr. Huckins’ appointment as Chief Financial Officer, Michael Graham stepped down from this position and moved into an advisory role to assist with the transition. Michael Graham remains a full-time employee with the Company, with the same compensation and under the same terms and conditions as his employment agreement, until his planned retirement on March 31, 2024.

Table of Contents

The following discussion relates to the compensation of our ~~three other most highly compensated~~NEOs whose compensation is disclosed below, as well as the overall principles underlying our executive ~~officers for the year ended December 31, 2020.~~compensation policies. Except as otherwise indicated, the information in this section relates to the compensation of our NEOs, and the principles underlying our executive compensation policies, during and for ~~2020. Our NEOs for 2020 were:~~

~~Lance Mitchell, President and Chief Executive Officer~~

2023.

~~Michael Graham, Chief Financial Officer~~

~~Stephan Pace, President, Sales and Chief Customer Officer~~

~~Table of Contents~~

•

~~Craig Cappel, President, Reynolds Cooking & Baking~~

~~Rachel Bishop, President, Hefty Tableware~~

~~The following discussion relates to the compensation of our NEOs whose compensation is disclosed below, as well as the overall principles underlying our executive compensation policies.~~

Our Compensation Objectives and Philosophy

Our compensation objectives include attracting and retaining top talent, motivating and rewarding the performance of senior executives in support of achievement of strategic, financial and operating performance objectives and ensuring that our total compensation packages are competitive in comparison to those offered by our peers. Our NEOs, as well as our employees generally, participate in compensation and benefits plans and programs that are intended to align our compensation programs with our business objectives, promote good corporate governance and seek to achieve our compensation objectives.

To ensure that management’s interests are aligned with those of our stockholders and to motivate and reward individual initiative and effort, our executive compensation program emphasizes a pay-for-performance compensation philosophy so that attainment of enterprise-wide, business unit and individual performance goals are rewarded. Through the use of performance-based plans that emphasize attainment of enterprise-wide and/or business unit goals, we seek to foster teamwork and commitment to performance. Further, the use of components such as equity ownership and long-term equity-based incentive compensation programs is important to ensure that the efforts of management are consistent with the objectives of our stockholders.

The CNG Committee also values the opinions of our stockholders, and it reviews and considers the outcome of our annual vote on executive compensation, also known as the “say-on-pay” vote, along with other relevant factors, in evaluating the compensation program for the NEOs. At our 2023 annual meeting, stockholders showed strong support for our executive compensation program, with approximately 99% of votes cast approving our advisory say-on-pay proposal. The CNG Committee considered the strong level of stockholder support and made no material changes in our executive compensation program as a result of the 2023 say-on-pay vote.

Risk Assessment of Compensation Programs

Our CNG Committee, based on an evaluation by ~~its~~management, assisted by the Committee’s independent compensation consultant, does not believe that our compensation arrangements, including financial performance measures used to determine short-term and long-term incentive payout amounts, provide our employees with an incentive to engage in business activities or other behavior that would expose us or our stockholders to risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our company.

Executive Compensation Process

Role of the Independent Compensation Consultant

~~Following our IPO in early 2020, the~~

The CNG Committee ~~assumed~~has responsibility for determining our compensation philosophy, structuring our compensation and benefits programs and determining appropriate payments and awards to our executive officers, including our NEOs. The CNG Committee is also responsible for implementing, monitoring and evaluating our executive compensation philosophy and objectives and overseeing the compensation program for senior executives. The CNG Committee’s responsibilities and authority are described fully in its Charter. Our CNG Committee has engaged Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC (“Pearl Meyer”), an independent compensation consultant, to advise on compensation matters.

In addition, Pearl Meyer provided an analysis of base salary, annual incentive program (“AIP”) compensation and long-term incentive (“LTI”) compensation for senior executives, comparing them to executives at companies in our peer group (the “Benchmark Comparison Group”) and using compensation survey data for similarly sized organizations in our industry.

Table of Contents

Peer Group

The Benchmark Comparison Group utilized as a benchmark for executive compensation matters for ~~2020~~2023 included:


• AptarGroup, Inc. • Central Garden & Pet Company • Church & Dwight Co., Inc. • Edgewell Personal Care Company • Energizer Holdings, Inc. • Greif, Inc. • Hasbro, Inc. • Helen of Troy Limited • Medifast, Inc.			• Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc.			• O-I Glass, Inc. • Sealed Air Corporation • Silgan Holdings Inc. • Snap-on Incorporated • Sonoco Products Company • Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. • The Clorox Company • The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company ~~• Silgan Holdings Inc.~~ ~~• Snap-on Incorporated~~ ~~• Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.~~ ~~• The Clorox Company~~ ~~• Tupperware Brands Corporation~~

The criteria considered in selecting peer companies for the Benchmark Comparison Group include the following:

•size, as measured by revenue, market capitalization and enterprise value;

•industry category, including consumer household, personal and ~~personal~~leisure products, household ~~appliances,~~durables, containers and packaging; and

•competition for sources of talent.

As part of our annual compensation planning, a review was performed of the Benchmark Comparison Group to ensure the group remains a reasonable basis of comparison of industry and size. In preparation for determining 2023 executive compensation matters, Tupperware Brands was removed from our Benchmark Comparison Group due to declining market capitalization and potential restructuring activity, and Sonoco Products Company was added due to its size, industry and competition for sources of talent.

Role of Management

Our CEO, in collaboration with Pearl Meyer and with input from the CNG Committee, makes recommendations to the CNG Committee for base salary, AIP, LTI and any other elements of our compensation program for each NEO (other than the CEO, whose compensation is determined solely by the CNG Committee). Our CEO also provides recommendations to the CNG Committee on other elements of our compensation program for senior executives, including, for example, the design and metrics under our AIP and LTI programs. While the CNG Committee will consider the CEO’s recommendations with respect to the compensation of the NEOs, the CNG Committee independently evaluates the recommendations and makes all final compensation decisions relating to the NEOs.

In the case of compensation for employees below the most senior level, the CNG Committee has delegated certain authority to our management to make determinations in accordance with guidelines established by the CNG Committee.

Table of Contents

Total Direct Compensation

The CNG Committee, advised by its independent compensation consultant Pearl Meyer, is responsible for overseeing and approving the executive compensation program for the Company’s executive officers, including our named executive officers. To establish the appropriate target total direct compensation for each position, Pearl Meyer provides and the Committee reviews the ~~median~~market levels for base salary, target annual cash, target LTI and total direct compensation based upon our Benchmark Comparison ~~Group.~~Group and published surveys. The Committee then considers ~~the median base salary compensation, median target annual cash incentive compensation and median equity compensation, also based upon our Benchmark Comparison Group,~~that market data, as well as other factors, in determining the elements of total direct compensation for each position.

~~Table of Contents~~

Elements of C~~ompensation~~

Compensation

The components of executive compensation for our NEOs, and the primary objectives of each, are summarized in the chart below:

Compensation Element

Description

Form

Objective

Base ~~salary~~

Salary

Fixed based on level of responsibility, experience, tenure and qualifications

Cash

• Support talent attraction and retention

Annual Incentive Program

Variable based on the achievement of annual financial metrics

Cash

• Link pay and performance

• Drive the achievement of short-term business objectives

LTI Compensation

Variable based on the achievement of longer-term goals and stockholder value creation

50% time-based RSUs and 50% performance share units (“PSUs”)

• Support talent attraction and retention

• Link pay and performance

• Drive the achievement of longer-term goals

• Align with shareholder interests and focus on creating value over long-term

Other Compensation and Benefits Programs

Employee health, welfare and retirement benefits

Group medical benefits

Life and disability insurance

401(k) plan participation

Nonqualified deferred compensation plan

• Support talent attraction and retention

Because of the ability of our NEOs to directly influence our overall performance, and consistent with our philosophy of linking pay to performance, the compensation programs allocate a significant portion of compensation paid to our NEOs to both short-term and long-term performance-based incentive programs. In addition, as an employee’s responsibility and ability to affect our financial results increases, base salary becomes a relatively smaller component of total compensation while long-term and at-risk incentive compensation becomes a larger component of total compensation.

Table of Contents

Base Sa~~lary~~

Salary

Base salaries are set at competitive levels necessary to attract and retain top-performing senior executives, including our NEOs, and are intended to compensate senior executives for their job responsibilities and level of experience. The CNG Committee has a goal to set each of the elements of total compensation at or around the 50th percentile of the Benchmark Comparison Group (and, for our presidents of our four business units, the overall general industry), adjusted to reflect each executive’s individual performance and contributions. However, as there were certain elements of compensation not available to us when we were wholly-owned by PEI, such as equity-based compensation, the CNG Committee recognizes that it will take time before all of the individual elements of total compensation can reach the 50^th ~~percentile goal.~~ In certain cases, including when an executive is recruited from another company or where it is otherwise appropriate to retain or incentivize an executive, the base salary may exceed the levels indicated in order to attract, and ultimately retain, the executive.

~~Michael Graham, Stephan Pace, Craig Cappel and Rachel Bishop each received a 3% merit increase, effective June 1, 2020. Lance~~

Mr. Mitchell did not receive a base salary adjustment in ~~2020.~~

2023. Mr. Graham and Mses. Bishop, Smith and Buckner received base salary adjustments of 3%, 3%, 5% and 11%, respectively, in 2023. All base salary adjustments for our NEOs in 2023 were made in an effort to align with our compensation goals.

In connection with his appointment as Chief Financial Officer, the CNG Committee established Mr. Huckins’ initial annual base salary at $675,000.

Annual Incentive Compensation

~~2020~~

2023 Annual Incentive Program

Our ~~2020~~2023 annual incentive program (“~~2020~~2023 AIP”) was designed to provide an opportunity for our senior executives, including our NEOs, to earn an annual incentive, paid in cash, based on the achievement of certain financial targets and strategic priorities. An executive’s incentive target is a percentage of his or her actual annual base ~~salary.~~

salary amount.

The ~~2020~~2023 AIP was designed to motivate our senior executives to achieve annual financial and other business goals based on our strategic, financial, and operating performance objectives. For our senior executives, including our NEOs, ~~90%~~80% of the payout under the ~~2020~~2023 AIP would be determined by ~~2020~~2023 Adjusted ~~EBITDA year-over-year growth~~EBIT as a percentage of 2022 Adjusted EBIT (“Adjusted ~~EBITDA~~EBIT Growth”). The remaining ~~10%~~20% would be ~~measured~~determined by ~~working capital achievements~~the 2023 increase in ~~2020.~~total net revenues relative to 2022 total net revenues (“Revenue Growth”). The ~~targets~~target levels, as well as threshold and ~~threshold~~maximum levels, for these performance metrics were set by the CNG Committee in the first quarter of ~~2020.~~2023. Based on the combined Adjusted ~~EBITDA~~EBIT Growth and ~~working capital~~Revenue Growth results, a participant could earn up to 200% of the target value.

In the first quarter of ~~2020,~~2023, the CNG Committee established the following payout levels that would be associated with the degree to which each of Adjusted ~~EBITDA~~EBIT Growth and Revenue Growth was attained for ~~2020:~~

2023:

Adjusted EBITDA Growth

Threshold

Target

Maximum

FY 2020 ($m)

590

662

708

% of FY 2019

90
%

101
%

108
%
Percentage Payout Level

25
%

100
%

200
%


Adjusted EBIT Growth	Threshold			Target			Maximum
FY 2023 ($m)		386			438			472
% of FY 2022		90	%		102	%		110	%
Percentage Payout Level		25	%		100	%		200	%

Revenue Growth	Threshold			Target			Maximum
FY 2023 ($m)		3,722			3,912			4,103
% of FY 2022		97.5	%		102.5	%		107.5	%
Percentage Payout Level		25	%		100	%		200	%

The CNG Committee provided that payout levels would be interpolated for results between the threshold and maximum levels.

Table of Contents

In the first quarter of ~~2020,~~2023 (with the exception of Mr. Huckins, which occurred in the third quarter of 2023), the CNG Committee also established the target amounts to which the resulting percentage payout level would be applied. The target percentage of actual base salary ~~and resulting dollar amount,~~for the year for each NEO was:

Name

Target % of
Base Salary

Target Dollar
Amount

Lance Mitchell

115
%

$
1,782,500

Michael Graham

60
%

487,616

Stephan Pace

60
%

274,849

Craig Cappel

60
%

282,967

Rachel Bishop

60
%

251,526


Name	Target % of Base Salary
Lance Mitchell		115	%
Scott Huckins		75	%
Rachel Bishop		65	%
Judith Buckner		65	%
Lisa Smith		65	%
Michael Graham		60	%

~~Table of Contents~~

In ~~February 2021,~~January 2024, the CNG Committee determined the degree to which the Adjusted ~~EBITDA~~EBIT Growth and ~~working capital~~Revenue Growth goals were attained, and the resulting payout level relative to the target amount for each metric. Based on the achievement level of the Adjusted ~~EBITDA~~EBIT Growth ~~and achievement of working capital targets in 2020,~~target, the ~~calculated payment~~payout for such metric was 200% ~~of target,~~; and based on the ~~following factors:~~

achievement level of the Revenue Growth target, the payout for such metric was 39%. After applying the applicable weightings of these metrics, the total payout level was 168% of target, as shown below:

Metric

Actual ($m / %)

Payout
Attainment
(%)

Weight
(%)

Final
Payout
(%)

Adjusted EBITDA Growth (FY 2020 result / % of FY 2019) ⁽¹⁾

$ 717 / 109%

200
%

90
%

180
%
Working Capital⁽²⁾

N/A

200
%

10
%

20
%
Total

200
%

~~(1)~~

~~Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. Refer to~~ ~~Appendix A~~
Metric Actual ($m / %) Payout
Attainment
(%) Weight
(%) Final
Payout
(%)
Adjusted EBIT Growth (FY 2023 result / % of FY 2022)⁽¹⁾ $512 / 119% 200 % 80 % 160 %
Revenue Growth (FY 2023 result / % of FY 2022) $3,756 / 98% 39 % 20 % 8 %
Total 168 %

(1)Adjusted EBIT is a non-GAAP financial measure. Refer to Appendix A to this Proxy Statement for a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure ~~to the corresponding GAAP measure.~~

~~(2)~~

~~The CNG Committee determined that the working capital goals were fully achieved.~~

~~The CNG Committee did not exercise any discretion to increase or decrease the amounts payable pursuant~~ to the ~~2020 AIP as calculated pursuant to the terms as described above. As a result, based~~corresponding GAAP measure.

Based on the results as applied to the ~~2020~~2023 AIP as described above, the CNG Committee’s approval resulted in the payment of the following amounts to our NEOs under the ~~2020~~2023 AIP:

Name

2020 AIP
Payment

Lance Mitchell

$
3,565,000

Michael Graham

$
975,233

Stephan Pace

$
549,698

Craig Cappel

$
565,934

Rachel Bishop

$
503,052


Name	2023 AIP Payout
Lance Mitchell	$	2,994,600
Scott Huckins(1)	$	162,422
Rachel Bishop	$	589,316
Judith Buckner	$	573,300
Lisa Smith	$	543,725
Michael Graham	$	854,137

(1) Mr. Huckins’ AIP payout amount was based on his base salary in 2023, which was prorated based on his start date.

The amounts paid to our NEOs pursuant to the ~~2020~~2023 AIP are set forth in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of our ~~2020~~ Summary Compensation Table, because the outcomes with respect to the relevant targets under the objectives were substantially uncertain at the time the targets were established by the CNG Committee and communicated to the NEOs.

~~IPO Success Transition Plan~~

In connection with our IPO, we entered into agreements with our NEOs and certain other key executives. The IPO Success Transition plan was implemented to further ensure leadership continuity, and its objectives were to retain executives through the IPO and beyond. Amounts under the plan were to be paid in two instalments. If the executive resigned or was terminated for cause before the end of the transition period, the executive would have been required to repay any instalments which had already been paid to him or her.

Table of Contents

~~The IPO Success Transition payments were made~~

In addition, in connection with Mr. Huckins’ appointment as ~~indicated below. No further payments are due. The following amounts are included in Summary Compensation Table~~Chief Financial Officer, the CNG Committee provided for a cash sign-on bonus of $500,000, which was paid to Mr. Huckins on December 29, 2023, and which is subject to full repayment to us by Mr. Huckins in the ~~“Bonus” column.~~

event that, within one year following the payment date, he voluntarily terminates his employment or we terminate his employment for cause.

Total IPO Success Transition Payments 2020

Lance Mitchell

$
1,782,500

Michael Graham

$
798,716

Stephan Pace

$
450,204

Craig Cappel

$
463,500

Rachel Bishop

$
412,000

Long-Term Incentive Compensation

Equity Awards Granted in ~~2020~~

~~In connection with our IPO, we also entered into equity retention agreements with our NEOs and certain other key executives.~~ 2023

The ~~retention plan was implemented to further ensure leadership continuity, and its objectives are to retain executives through the IPO and beyond.~~

~~On February 4, 2020, we issued the IPO RSUs to the NEOs and certain other persons under the Equity Incentive Plan.~~ ~~The RSUs vest over a three-year period, with 1/3 vesting each year, beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant. Each of these executives must remain an employee on the applicable vesting date to receive shares underlying the vested RSUs.~~

~~In addition to the IPO RSUs, the~~ LTI program for ~~2020~~2023 consisted of RSU and PSU awards. The CNG Committee believes that this mix emphasizes performance, further aligning with our stockholders’ interests, and promotes retention. The RSUs vest over a three-year period, with 1/3 vesting each year, beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant. The PSUs ~~will be~~are earned based on the extent to which specified performance metrics established at the date of the grant ~~are achieved, which for~~were achieved. For our senior executives, including our NEOs, 50% of the target number of PSUs ~~granted in 2020 include~~that could be earned would be determined by 2023 adjusted earnings per share ~~growth over the 2021-2022 period and Adjusted EBITDA growth over the 2020-2022 period. The~~as a percentage of 2022 adjusted earnings per share ~~performance factor is weighted at~~(“Adjusted EPS Growth”). The remaining 50% ~~and~~would be determined by the ~~Adjusted EBITDA performance factor is weighted at 50%.~~2023 Free Cash Flow. Participants ~~will have~~had the ability to earn ~~50%~~25% of the target number of PSUs for achieving threshold performance and 200% of the target number of PSUs for achieving maximum performance. The number of PSUs earned, if any, ~~will~~would vest on the third anniversary of the date of grant.

At the time of grant, the CNG Committee established the following percentage of target number of PSUs that could be earned, based on the degree to which each of Adjusted EPS Growth and Free Cash Flow was attained for 2023:


Adjusted EPS Growth	Threshold			Target			Maximum
FY 2023 ($)		1.13			1.32			1.52
% of FY 2022		88	%		103.5	%		119	%
Percentage PSUs Earned		25	%		100	%		200	%

Free Cash Flow	Threshold			Target			Maximum
FY 2023 ($m)		328			410			492
Percentage PSUs Earned		25	%		100	%		200	%

The number of RSUs and the target number of PSUs granted to our NEOs in ~~2020~~2023 were as follows:

Name

IPO

RSUs (#)

LTI

RSUs (#)

LTI

PSUs (#)

Lance Mitchell

59,615

32,311

Lance Mitchell

Scott Huckins

Rachel Bishop

Judith Buckner

Lisa Smith

Michael Graham

15,360

9,987

Stephan Pace

8,658

5,635

Craig Cappel

8,913

5,802

Rachel Bishop

7,923

5,152

Michael Graham

•Pension Plan for Pactiv Evergreen ~~Pension Plan~~ (formerly known as ~~Reynolds Group~~the Pactiv Evergreen Pension Plan). Certain employees, including ~~Messrs. Pace~~Mses. Buckner and ~~Cappel,~~Smith, have frozen benefits under the Pension Plan for Pactiv ~~Evergreen Pension Plan.~~

Evergreen.

Table of Contents

Employees who are at a designated salary grade or above, including all NEOs, may defer a portion of their salary and bonus each year into a nonqualified deferred compensation plan, which is a tax-deferred plan. We also make contributions to this plan mirroring percentage contributions made to the 401(k) plan. This program is intended to promote retention by providing a long-term savings opportunity on a tax-efficient basis. The amounts deferred are our unsecured obligations, receive no preferential standing, and are subject to the same risks as any of our other unsecured obligations.

We provide the NEOs with limited perquisites and other personal benefits, including reimbursement of relocation costs. Additionally, we purchase tickets to various cultural, charitable, civic, entertainment and sporting events for business development and relationship building purposes, and to maintain involvement in communities in which we operate and our employees live. Occasionally, our employees, including the NEOs, make personal use of tickets that would not otherwise be used for business purposes. The CNG Committee periodically reviews the levels of perquisites and other personal benefits provided to our NEOs. The CNG Committee intends to maintain only those perquisites

~~Table of Contents~~

and other benefits that it determines to be necessary components of total compensation and that are not inconsistent with stockholder interests.

Table of Contents

Employment Agreements

We have entered into employment agreements with each of our ~~NEOs.~~NEOs (the “Employment Agreements”). The ~~employment agreements~~Employment Agreements provide for an initial base salary and an annual cash target incentive percentage, which may be adjusted from time to time by the CNG Committee. Other key elements of these agreements are outlined below.

Employee

Severance

(1)

Restrictive

Covenants⁽¹⁾

(2)

Lance Mitchell

• 12 months base salary plus a prorated target annual incentive

• 24 months base salary plus a prorated target annual incentive if following a Sale of Business⁽²⁾

(3)

• 12 months COBRA premium assistance

Yes

~~Michael Graham~~

Scott Huckins

• 12 months base salary

• 24 months base salary plus a prorated target annual incentive if following a Sale of Business⁽²⁾

(3)

• 12 months COBRA premium assistance

Yes

~~Stephan Pace~~

Rachel Bishop

• 12 months base salary

• 24 months base salary plus a prorated target annual incentive if following a Sale of Business⁽²⁾

(3)

• 12 months COBRA premium assistance

Yes

~~Craig Cappel~~

Judith Buckner

• 12 months base salary

• 24 months base salary plus a prorated target annual incentive if following a Sale of Business⁽²⁾

(3)

• 12 months COBRA premium assistance

Yes

~~Rachel Bishop~~

Lisa Smith

• 12 months base salary

• 24 months base salary plus a prorated target annual incentive if following a Sale of Business⁽²⁾

(3)

• 12 months COBRA premium assistance

Yes

Michael Graham(4)

~~Yes~~

~~(1)~~

~~Restrictive covenants include non-competition and non-solicitation covenants during employment and for one year following termination of employment for any reason.~~

~~(2)~~

~~Increased severance provided if within~~• 12 months base salary

• 24 months base salary plus a prorated target annual incentive if following a Sale of Business ~~the employee is terminated without cause or resigns following a material reduction in his or her remuneration or scope of duties.~~

(3)

• 12 months COBRA premium assistance

Yes

(1) Severance and COBRA premium assistance are provided if the employee is terminated without cause. Upon termination of employment, equity awards will be treated based on individual equity agreements. See the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control - Equity Awards” section below for further discussion.

(2) Restrictive covenants include non-competition and non-solicitation covenants during employment and for one year following termination of employment for any reason.

(3) Increased severance is provided if within 12 months following a Sale of Business, the employee is terminated without cause or resigns following a material reduction in his or her remuneration or scope of duties.

(4) Upon Mr. Graham’s planned retirement on March 31, 2024, he will no longer be entitled to any severance benefits under his Employment Agreement, but the restrictive covenants will still apply to him for the period indicated in the agreement.

Table of Contents

Equity Incentive Plan

The purpose of the Equity Incentive Plan is to motivate and reward our employees, directors, consultants and advisors to perform at the highest level and to further our best interests and those of our shareholders.

Administration

Our CNG Committee administers the Equity Incentive Plan. To the extent not inconsistent with applicable law, our CNG Committee may delegate to one or more of our officers some or all of the authority under the Equity Incentive Plan, including the authority to grant all types of awards authorized under the Equity Incentive Plan, except for grants to executive officers.

~~Table of Contents~~

Eligibility

Generally, all employees, directors, consultants or other advisors of the Company or any of its affiliates are eligible to receive awards.

No Repricing

Except as provided in the adjustment provision of the Equity Incentive Plan, no action will directly or indirectly, through cancellation and regrant or any other method, reduce, or have the effect of reducing, the exercise price of any option or an SAR established at the time of grant thereof without approval of our shareholders.

Director Pay Cap

Subject to the adjustment provision of the Equity Incentive Plan, an individual who is a non-employee director may not receive awards, in cash or otherwise, for any calendar year that total more than $750,000 in the aggregate.

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy

Our employees and directors are prohibited from (i) engaging in any hedging transactions (including transactions involving options, puts, calls, prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds or other derivatives) that are designed to hedge or speculate on any change in the market value of the Company’s equity securities, and (ii) pledging Company securities in any circumstance, including by purchasing Company securities on margin or holding Company securities in a margin account.

Table of Contents

Clawback Policy

~~We have a~~

Effective October 2, 2023, our Board of Directors adopted an Amended and Restated Compensation Recoupment Policy (the “Clawback Policy”) in accordance with Nasdaq’s listing standards. The Clawback Policy applies to all incentive-based compensation, which is any compensation that ~~permits us to recover from~~is granted, earned, or vested based wholly or in part upon the attainment of a financial reporting measure, received by our executive officers, including our named executive officers.

The Clawback Policy applies in the case of an accounting restatement due to the material noncompliance of the Company with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, including any required accounting restatement to correct an error in previously issued financial statements that is material to the previously issued financial statements, or that would result in a material misstatement if the error were corrected in the current period or left uncorrected in the current period. The Clawback Policy provides that promptly following such an accounting restatement, the amount of erroneously awarded compensation will be determined, which is the excess of the amount of incentive-based compensation received by ~~him or her~~current and former executive officers during ~~any of~~ the three completed fiscal years ~~completed before any financial~~immediately preceding the required restatement ~~trigger date. In the event of a financial restatement, if~~date over the amount of ~~incentive~~incentive-based compensation ~~actually paid~~that otherwise would have been received had it been determined based on the restated amounts. The Company will provide each such executive officer with a written notice of such amount and a demand for repayment or return. If such repayment or return is not made within a reasonable time, the Clawback Policy provides that the Company will recover the erroneously awarded compensation in a reasonable and prompt manner using any lawful method, subject to limited exceptions as permitted by Nasdaq.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

We have adopted Stock Ownership Guidelines applicable to our executive officers that became effective on July 1, 2023. Under the Guidelines, the following officers are expected to own shares of our common stock with a value at least equal to the following:

•Chief Executive Officer: 5x annual base salary;

•Business Unit Presidents and Chief Financial Officer: 3x annual base salary; and

•Other executive officers: 2x annual base salary

Shares owned directly and indirectly, as well as full-value equity awards (such as RSUs or earned PSUs) with only a time-based vesting condition, count toward the ownership level under the Guidelines. Unearned PSUs and stock options (if any were to be granted by the Company) do not count toward the ownership level under the Guidelines.

The applicable ownership level is to be achieved within the later of July 1, 2028 (five years after the effective date of the Guidelines) or five years following when the officer becomes subject to the Guidelines. Prior to the first applicable Compliance Date, until an executive officer ~~exceeds~~has satisfied the ~~amount~~applicable level of ~~such compensation that would have been paid as calculated based on the financial restatement, the CNG Committee may seek~~ownership, he or she is required to ~~recover from such executive for the benefit~~retain not less than 50% of the ~~Company an amount equal~~net shares received (shares received after any shares are withheld to satisfy the ~~excess~~applicable withholding taxes) from the vesting or settlement of any equity award granted after the effective date of the ~~awarded compensation over~~Guidelines. As of and following the ~~adjusted compensation.~~

first applicable Compliance Date, if the applicable level of ownership has not been achieved, or if it has been achieved but an executive officer falls below the applicable level of ownership, he or she will be required to retain 100% of the net shares received from the vesting or settlement of any equity award granted until the applicable level of ownership is achieved.

Table of Contents

Tax and Accounting Considerations

Tax Considerations of Our Executive Compensation

Section 162(m) of the Code generally limits the tax deductibility of annual compensation paid by public companies for certain executive officers to $1 million. Although our CNG Committee is mindful of the benefits of tax deductibility when determining executive compensation, the CNG Committee may approve compensation that will not be fully-deductible in order to ensure competitive levels of total compensation for its executive officers.

Accounting for Our Stock-Based Compensation

We account for stock-based payments, including grants under each of our equity compensation plans, in accordance with the requirements of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718.

Table of Contents

COMPENSATION, NOMINATING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CO~~MMITTEE~~COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based upon this review and discussion, the Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2020.~~

2023.


THE COMPENSATION, NOMINATING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

Gregory Cole, Chair
~~Thomas Degnan, Chair~~ Helen Golding
~~Gregory Cole~~
Richard Noll

Table of Contents

SUMMARY ~~COMPENSATION~~COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation paid to our NEOs during our fiscal years ended December 31, ~~2020, 2019~~2023, 2022 and ~~2018.~~

2021.


Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)			Bonus⁽²⁾ ($)		Stock Awards⁽³⁾ ($)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation⁽⁴⁾ ($)		Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings⁽⁵⁾ ($)		All Other Compensation⁽⁶⁾ ($)		Total ($)
Lance Mitchell	2020		1,550,000			1,782,500		3,488,004		4,421,153		—		168,564		11,410,221
Lance Mitchell
Lance Mitchell
President and Chief Executive Officer	2019		1,550,000			1,550,000		—		3,429,903		—		168,564		6,698,467
	2018		1,458,333			—		—		2,645,687		—		122,322		4,226,342
President and Chief Executive Officer
President and Chief Executive Officer
				2021
				2021
				2021
Scott Huckins
Scott Huckins
Scott Huckins
Chief Financial Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Rachel Bishop
Rachel Bishop
Rachel Bishop
President, Hefty Tableware
President, Hefty Tableware
President, Hefty Tableware
				2021
				2021
				2021
Judith Buckner⁽⁶⁾
Judith Buckner⁽⁶⁾
Judith Buckner⁽⁶⁾
President, Reynolds Cooking & Baking
President, Reynolds Cooking & Baking
President, Reynolds Cooking & Baking
Lisa Smith⁽⁶⁾
Lisa Smith⁽⁶⁾
Lisa Smith⁽⁶⁾
President, Hefty Waste and Storage
President, Hefty Waste and Storage
President, Hefty Waste and Storage
Michael Graham	2020		812,694			798,716		998,380		1,305,874		—		97,350		4,013,014
Chief Financial Officer	2019		789,023			798,716		—		1,076,503		—		95,634		2,759,876
	2018		766,042			—		—		984,818		—		92,632		1,843,492
Stephan Pace	2020		458,082			450,204		563,096		736,066		58,600		64,340		2,330,388
President, Sales and Chief Customer Officer	2019		444,740			225,102		—		606,781		75,365		62,947		1,414,935
	2018		431,786			—		—		559,731		—		62,524		1,054,041
Craig Cappel	2020		471,611			463,500		579,742		748,286		55,125		64,564		2,382,828
President, Reynolds Cooking & Baking	2019		457,875			463,500		—		602,882		64,849		55,009		1,644,115
	2018		401,172			—		—		445,961		—		50,230		897,363
Rachel Bishop⁽¹⁾	2020		419,210			412,000		515,014		604,052		—		56,274		2,006,550
President, Hefty Tableware	2019		372,152			412,000		—		373,415		—		30,578		1,188,145
Michael Graham
Michael Graham
Former Chief Financial Officer
Former Chief Financial Officer
Former Chief Financial Officer
				2021
				2021
				2021

$500,000 paid to Mr. Huckins on December 29, 2023, which bonus is subject to full repayment to us by Mr. Huckins in the event that, within one year following the payment date, he voluntarily terminates his employment or we terminate his employment for cause.

Awards and payments under the prior PEI LTIP are set forth on the tables below. The first table shows the Target Opportunity Award for each NEO based upon performance results in prior years (expressed as a percentage). The amount reflected is the maximum amount that can be earned for such grant cycle. There was no PEI grant in 2020.

(3) Represents the ~~business meeting its performance goals. The second table shows~~NEO’s payouts under the ~~payouts (and~~AIP for ~~2021, potential payouts) for each of~~ the ~~grants.~~

Name

2018
($)

2018
%

2019
($)

2019
%

Lance Mitchell

1,400,000

72
%

1,550,000

101
%
Michael Graham

564,650

72
%

581,590

101
%
Stephan Pace

318,270

72
%

327,818

101
%
Craig Cappel

287,799

72
%

337,500

101
%
Rachel Bishop

—

—

300,000

101
%

Name

2018
($)

2019
($)

2020
($)

2021^(A)
($)

Lance Mitchell

2017 Grant

399,100

399,100

2018 Grant

334,320

334,320

334,320

2019 Grant

521,833

521,833

521,833

Michael Graham

2017 Grant

168,299

168,299

2018 Grant

134,838

134,838

134,839

2019 Grant

195,802

195,802

195,802

Stephan Pace

2017 Grant

94,863

94,863

2018 Grant

76,003

76,003

76,003

2019 Grant

110,365

110,365

110,365

Craig Cappel

2017 Grant

85,366

85,366

2018 Grant

68,726

68,726

68,727

2019 Grant

113,625

113,625

113,625

Rachel Bishop ^(B)

2019 Grant

101,000

101,000

101,000

~~(A)~~

~~Payouts for 2021 are contingent on the Company meeting performance goals.~~

applicable year.

~~(B)~~

~~Ms. Bishop joined the Company in February 2019.~~

~~(5)~~

(4) Represents the aggregate change in the actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit under the legacy entitlements under the ~~Pactiv Evergreen~~ Pension Plan for Pactiv Evergreen for each of ~~Mr. Pace~~Ms. Buckner and ~~Mr. Cappel~~Ms. Smith (the only two NEOs who are participants in such plan), from December 31, ~~2019~~2022 to December 31, ~~2020~~2023 for the ~~2020~~2023 amounts and from December 31, ~~2018~~2021 to December 31, ~~2019~~2022 for the ~~2019~~2022 amounts. In ~~2018,~~2022, there was a decrease in the value of plan benefits for ~~Mr. Pace and Mr. Cappel~~Ms. Buckner ($~~22,845 and $23,846, respectively)~~82,550), so ~~these values are~~this value is reported as $0.

No NEO received above market or preferential earnings on deferred compensation in any of the years indicated. In the Summary Compensation Table included in Part III, Item 11 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, amounts were shown for each NEO for the 2019 year that included earnings on deferred compensation that were not above market or preferential. The 2019 amounts in this column in the table above remove those amounts, as they are not required to be disclosed in this table. As a result, the amounts in the “Total” column for 2019 have been reduced by the same amount.

~~(6)~~

~~Primarily represents employer contributions to the 401(k) Retirement Plan and the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan.~~

Table of Contents

(5) The ~~following table presents our~~amounts reported in this column for 2023 include employer contributions to the 401(k) Retirement Plan and the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan, ~~for~~ the ~~2020 year.~~

Name

Contributions
To 401(k)
Plan ($)

Contributions To
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Plan ($)

Lance Mitchell

22,800

142,200

Michael Graham

17,412

75,616

Stephan Pace

22,800

39,218

Craig Cappel

22,800

40,606

Rachel Bishop

22,541

32,530

~~The applicable amounts for the 2019 year were as follows:~~

Name

Contributions
To 401(k)
Plan ($)

Contributions To
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Plan ($)

Lance Mitchell

22,400

142,600

Michael Graham

21,122

70,690

Stephan Pace

22,400

36,288

Craig Cappel

22,400

30,518

Rachel Bishop

16,623

12,280

~~Other benefits reported under All Other Compensation include~~amount of dividend equivalents paid on unvested RSUs, group term life insurance and wellness ~~credits. Health~~credits as follows:


Name	Company Contributions To 401(k) Plan ($)		Company Contributions To Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan ($)		Dividend Equivalents ($)		Group Term Life Insurance ($)		Wellness Credits ($)		Total All Other Compensation ($)
Lance Mitchell		26,400		138,600		132,090		3,564		750		301,404
Scott Huckins		8,288		—		—		387		—		8,675
Rachel Bishop		25,105		34,130		20,310		3,000		2,000		84,545
Judith Buckner		25,320		31,725		17,551		1,436		1,000		77,032
Lisa Smith		26,400		29,249		9,328		2,322		2,000		69,299
Michael Graham		17,657		58,692		37,397		3,564		2,000		119,310

(6) As permitted by SEC rules, because 2022 was Ms. Buckner’s and ~~welfare benefits are~~Ms. Smith’s first year as NEOs, the compensation paid to them in 2021 is not ~~reported to the extent these benefits are generally available to all other salaried and non-union hourly employees.~~

included in this table.

Table of Contents

~~2020~~

2023 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

The following table sets forth information regarding grants of plan-based awards to our NEOs during ~~2020.~~

2023.

Estimated Possible Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards⁽¹⁾

Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards

Name and
Award Type

Grant
Date

Date of
CNG
Committee
Approval

Threshold
($)

Target
($)

Maximum
($)

Threshold
(#)

Target
(#)

Maximum
(#)

All Other
Stock
Awards
Number
of Shares
of Stock or
Units (#)

Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and
Option
Awards
($)⁽²⁾

Lance Mitchell

2020 AIP

445,625

1,782,500

3,565,000

IPO RSUs

2/4/2020

1/21/2020

59,615

1,549,990

LTI RSUs

3/5/2020

3/4/2020

32,311

969,007

LTI PSUs

3/5/2020

3/4/2020

16,156

32,311

64,622

969,007

Michael Graham

2020 AIP

121,904

487,616

975,233

IPO RSUs

2/4/2020

1/21/2020

15,360

399,360

LTI RSUs

3/5/2020

3/4/2020

9,987

299,510

LTI PSUs

3/5/2020

3/4/2020

4,994

9,987

19,974

299,510

Stephan Pace

2020 AIP

68,712

274,849

549,698

IPO RSUs

2/4/2020

1/21/2020

8,658

225,108

LTI RSUs

3/5/2020

3/4/2020

5,635

168,994

LTI PSUs

3/5/2020

3/4/2020

2,818

5,635

11,270

168,994

Craig Cappel

2020 AIP

70,742

282,967

565,934

IPO RSUs

2/4/2020

1/21/2020

8,913

231,738

LTI RSUs

3/5/2020

3/4/2020

5,802

174,002

LTI PSUs

3/5/2020

3/4/2020

2,901

5,802

11,604

174,002

Rachel Bishop

2020 AIP

62,882

251,526

503,052

IPO RSUs

2/4/2020

1/21/2020

7,923

205,998

LTI RSUs

3/5/2020

3/4/2020

5,152

154,508

LTI PSUs

3/5/2020

3/4/2020

2,576

5,152

10,304

154,508

~~(1)~~

Amounts shown in this column represent the potential cash payout amounts under the 2020 AIP. The actual cash payout amounts under the 2020 AIP are disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column.


			Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards⁽¹⁾						Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards
Name and Award Type	Grant Date	Date of CNG Committee Approval	Threshold ($)		Target ($)		Maximum ($)		Threshold (#)		Target (#)		Maximum (#)		All Other Stock Awards Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)⁽²⁾
Lance Mitchell
2023 AIP				445,625		1,782,500		3,565,000
RSUs	2/1/2023	1/25/2023														65,017		1,937,507
PSUs	2/1/2023	1/25/2023								16,254		65,017		130,034				1,937,507
Scott Huckins
2023 AIP				24,170		96,680		193,359
RSUs⁽³⁾	12/1/2023	9/5/2023														56,647		1,500,013
Rachel Bishop
2023 AIP				87,696		350,783		701,567
RSUs	2/1/2023	1/25/2023														12,254		365,169
PSUs	2/1/2023	1/25/2023								3,064		12,254		24,508				365,169
Judith Buckner
2023 AIP				85,313		341,250		682,500
RSUs	2/1/2023	1/25/2023														11,892		354,382
PSUs	2/1/2023	1/25/2023								2,973		11,892		23,784				354,382
Lisa Smith
2023 AIP				80,911		323,646		647,292
RSUs	2/1/2023	1/25/2023														11,326		337,515
PSUs	2/1/2023	1/25/2023								2,831		11,325		22,650				337,485
Michael Graham
2023 AIP				127,104		508,415		1,016,830
RSUs	2/1/2023	1/25/2023														18,635		555,323
PSUs	2/1/2023	1/25/2023								4,659		18,634		37,268				555,293

~~(2)~~

Amounts represent the grant date fair value of the awards determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Amounts related to PSUs represent the value at the grant date based upon the probable outcome of the performance conditions.

(1)Amounts shown in this column represent the potential cash payout amounts under the 2023 AIP. The actual cash payout amounts under the 2023 AIP are disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column. For Mr. Huckins, the potential cash payout amounts are based on his prorated salary for 2023.

(2)Amounts represent the grant date fair value of the awards determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Amounts related to PSUs represent the value at the grant date based upon the probable outcome of the performance conditions.

(3)Mr. Huckins’ RSUs were granted on December 1, 2023 in connection with his appointment as Chief Financial Officer.

Table of Contents

O~~UTSTANDING~~

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT ~~2020~~2023 FISCAL YEAR-END

The following table sets forth certain information regarding equity awards that have been granted to our named executive officers and that were outstanding as of December 31, ~~2020:~~

2023:

Stock
Awards
Name

Grant
Date

Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested (#)

Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested ($)⁽¹⁾

Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other
Rights That Have
Not Vested (#)

Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other
Rights That Have
Not Vested
($)⁽¹⁾
Lance Mitchell

2/4/2020

59,615

⁽²⁾

1,790,835

3/5/2020

32,311

⁽³⁾

970,622

3/5/2020

32,311
⁽⁴⁾

970,622
Michael Graham

2/4/2020

15,360

⁽²⁾

461,414

3/5/2020

9,987

⁽³⁾

300,009

3/5/2020

9,987
⁽⁴⁾

300,009
Stephan Pace

2/4/2020

8,658

⁽²⁾

260,086

3/5/2020

5,635

⁽³⁾

169,275

3/5/2020

5,635
⁽⁴⁾

169,275
Craig Cappel

2/4/2020

8,913

⁽²⁾

267,747

3/5/2020

5,802

⁽³⁾

174,292

3/5/2020

5,802
⁽⁴⁾

174,292
Rachel Bishop

2/4/2020

7,923

⁽²⁾

238,007

3/5/2020

5,152

⁽³⁾

154,766

3/5/2020

5,152
⁽⁴⁾

154,766

~~(1)~~

~~Market value is calculated by multiplying the number of shares by $30.04, the closing sale price per share of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on December 31, 2020.~~


	Stock Awards
Name	Grant Date	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)			Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)⁽¹⁰⁾
Lance Mitchell	2/1/2021		19,234	⁽¹⁾		516,241
	2/1/2022		42,955	⁽²⁾		1,152,912
	2/1/2023		178,797	⁽³⁾		4,798,911
Scott Huckins	12/1/2023		56,647	⁽⁴⁾		1,520,405
Rachel Bishop	2/1/2021		3,103	⁽¹⁾		83,285
	2/1/2022		7,856	⁽²⁾		210,855
	2/1/2023		33,699	⁽⁵⁾		904,481
Judith Buckner	2/1/2021		2,758	⁽¹⁾		74,025
	2/1/2022		7,108	⁽²⁾		190,779
	2/1/2023		32,703	⁽⁶⁾		877,749
Lisa Smith	2/1/2021		2,689	⁽¹⁾		72,173
	2/1/2022		7,108	⁽²⁾		190,779
	2/1/2023		31,145	⁽⁷⁾		835,932
Michael Graham	2/1/2021		5,672	⁽¹⁾		152,236
	2/1/2022		12,311	⁽⁸⁾		330,427
	2/1/2023		51,245	⁽⁹⁾		1,375,416

~~(2)~~

~~Represents RSUs that vest one-third on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date of February 4, 2020, subject to continued service on each vesting date.~~

~~(3)~~

~~Represents RSUs that vest one-third on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date of March 5, 2020, subject to continued service on each vesting date.~~

(1)Represents RSUs that vested on February 1, 2024.

~~(4)~~

~~Represents the target number of PSUs that can be earned based on the results of performance measures during the three-year performance period of 2020-2022. The PSUs that are~~

(2)Represents RSUs that vest one-half on each of February 1, 2024 and 2025, subject to continued service on each vesting date.

(3)Represents 65,017 RSUs that will vest one-third on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date, subject to continued service on each vesting date, and 113,780 PSUs that were earned based on 2023 performance and will vest on February 1, 2026, subject to continued service.

(4)Represents RSUs that vest one-third on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date, subject to continued service on each vesting date.

(5)Represents 12,254 RSUs that will vest one-third on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date, subject to continued service on each vesting date, and 21,445 PSUs that were earned based on 2023 performance and will vest on February 1, 2026, subject to continued service.

(6)Represents 11,892 RSUs that will vest one-third on each of the first three anniversaries of its respective grant date, subject to continued service on each vesting date, and 20,811 PSUs that were earned based on 2023 performance and will vest on February 1, 2026, subject to continued service.

(7)Represents 11,326 RSUs that will vest one-third on each of the first three anniversaries of its respective grant date, subject to continued service on each vesting date, and 19,819 PSUs that were earned based on 2023 performance and will vest on February 1, 2026, subject to continued service.

(8)Represents RSUs that will vest one-half on each of February 1, 2024 and 2025, as Mr. Graham qualifies for Enhanced Retirement (as defined and described under “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control - Equity Awards” below) and will retire over a year after the grant date of these RSUs.

(9)Represents 18,635 RSUs that will vest one-third on each of the first three anniversaries of its respective grant date and 32,610 PSUs that were earned based on 2023 performance and will vest on February 1, 2026, as Mr. Graham qualifies for Enhanced Retirement (as defined and described under “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control - Equity Awards” below) and will retire over a year after the grant date of these RSUs and PSUs.

(10)Market value is calculated by multiplying the number of shares by $26.84, the closing sale price per share of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on December 29, 2023, the last trading day of 2023.

Table of Contents

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED

The following table sets forth certain information regarding RSUs held by our named executive officers that vested in 2023. None of our named executive officers holds any stock options, and therefore no stock options were exercised in 2023.


	Stock Awards
	Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting⁽¹⁾		Value Realized on Vesting⁽²⁾
Name	(#)		($)
Lance Mitchell		71,355		2,104,574
Scott Huckins		—		—
Rachel Bishop		11,390		335,822
Judith Buckner		9,965		293,927
Lisa Smith		6,661		197,360
Michael Graham		20,277		597,334

(1)Represents RSUs that vested on February 1, 2023, February 4, 2023 and March 5, 2023, before shares were withheld for taxes.

(2)Value realized is calculated by multiplying the closing price of our common stock on the date of vesting by the number of RSUs that vested on that date.

2023 ~~subject to continued service on the vesting date.~~

~~2020~~ PENSION BENEFITS

~~(1)~~

(1)The amounts shown in this column are reported in the Summary Compensation Table, as follows:


Name	Amount Reported in the Salary Column for 2023 ($)		Amount Reported in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation Column for 2023 ($)
Lance Mitchell		93,000		179,676
Scott Huckins		—		—
Rachel Bishop		53,967		—
Judith Buckner		21,000		34,398
Lisa Smith		54,771		54,372
Michael Graham		169,471		427,068

(2)The amounts shown in this column are reported in the Summary Compensation Table as part of the amounts in the “All Other Compensation” column for 2023.

(3)Of the amounts shown in this column, the following amounts are or were previously reported in the Summary Compensation Table:


Name	Aggregate Amount Reported in Summary Compensation Table ~~as follows:~~ of this and Prior Proxy Statements ($)
Lance Mitchell		2,308,141
Scott Huckins		—
Rachel Bishop		1,006,401
Judith Buckner		217,407
Lisa Smith		500,540
Michael Graham		4,634,588

Name

Amount Reported in the Salary Column for 2020 ($)

Amount Reported in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation Column for 2020 ($)

Lance Mitchell

93,000

213,900

Michael Graham

284,443

341,331

Stephan Pace

27,485

274,849

Craig Cappel

28,297

56,593

Rachel Bishop

41,921

251,526

~~(2)~~

~~The amounts shown in this column are reported in the Summary Compensation Table as part of the amounts in the “All Other Compensation” column for 2020.~~

Table of Contents

~~(3)~~

Of the amounts shown in this column, the following amounts are reported in the Summary Compensation Table as compensation including in the “Salary,” “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” and “All Other Compensation” columns to the named executive officers in 2019 and 2018, respectively: Mr. Mitchell: $366,079 and $277,236; Mr. Graham: $617,326 and $631,072; Mr. Pace: $221,300 and $82,847; Mr. Cappel: $68,942 and $48,123; and Ms. Bishop: $383,712 and $0.

~~(4)~~

Mr. Graham’s fiscal year-end balance includes $2,584,855 that was transferred to his account from a previous deferred compensation plan in which he participated, the Graham Packaging Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan.

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

Employment Agreements

The Employment Agreements with the NEOs provide for severance in the event of certain types of termination:

•if the executive is terminated without Cause (defined below) prior to a Sale of Business (defined below), the executive would be entitled to receive one times his or her base salary, paid in equal installments over 12 months following the date of termination;

~~Table~~

◦Mr. Mitchell would also be entitled to his annual bonus at target prorated through the date of ~~Contents~~

~~Mr. Mitchell would also be entitled to his annual bonus at target prorated through the date of termination; and~~

termination; and

•if a Sale of Business occurs and within 12 months following the closing of such Sale of Business either the executive is terminated without Cause, or executive’s position is materially reduced in remuneration or scope of duties (“Good Reason”) and the executive terminates his or her employment, then the executive would be entitled to receive (i) two times his or her base salary plus (ii) his or her annual bonus at target prorated through the date of termination, paid in equal installments over 24 months following the Date of Termination.

The Employment Agreements provide that if the executive breaches any of the provisions of the Restrictive Covenant Agreement to which he or she is a party, the executive’s right to receive further payments of severance amounts will be ~~terminated~~.

terminated.

In addition, if the executive is terminated without Cause,, then the executive and his or her eligible dependents will continue to be covered by the Company’s health plan for 12 months from the date of termination.

“Sale of Business” is defined in the Employment Agreements as the sale or other disposition of (x) more than 50% of the shares or other equity interests of the Company or the Company’s direct or indirect parent to a non-affiliated party (which, for all executives other than Mr. Mitchell, shall not include a sale or an offering by Packaging Finance Limited of some or all of its shares in the Company, so long as the remainder of the shares continue to be owned by the public), or (y) more than 50% of the businesses or assets that, as of the most recent year end, generated more than 50% of the Company’s EBITDA (as determined in good faith by ~~PEI’s CEO,~~the Company’s Board of Directors, based on the Company’s regularly prepared financial statements), provided that a disposition as a result of lender foreclosure on assets or pursuant to a bankruptcy or judicially administered reorganization shall not constitute a Sale of Business. The Employment Agreements also provide that the executive’s position shall not be materially reduced by reason of the Company being smaller or having less operations as a result of the Sale of Business so long as the executive’s duties and responsibilities are generally consistent with his or her duties and responsibilities prior to the Sale of Business.

“Cause” is defined in the Employment Agreements as in the good faith determination of the CEO or Board of Directors that the executive has engaged in conduct consisting of (i) dishonesty or other serious misconduct related to his or her duties as an employee of the Company, or (ii) willful and continual failure (unless due to incapacity resulting from physical or mental illness) to perform the duties of the executive’s employment after written demand for substantial performance is delivered to the executive by the Company specifically identifying the manner in which the executive has not substantially performed such duties.

Table of Contents

Equity Awards

The RSU award agreements applicable to the NEOs for RSUs granted prior to 2022 provide that in the event of a termination of service due to the participant’s death or ~~retirement,~~Retirement (as defined below), a pro rata portion of the ~~RSU~~RSUs with respect to the applicable vesting period will vest following such termination of service based on a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of full calendar months the participant had been employed in the applicable vesting period through the date of termination, and the denominator of which is 12; provided that the participant must have been employed by the Company for at least twelve (12) months following the grant date of the RSUs.

The PSU award agreements applicable to the NEOs for PSUs granted prior to 2022 provide that in the event of a termination of service due to the participant’s death or ~~retirement,~~Retirement, any unvested PSUs shall vest effective as of the date of such termination of service based on the likely level of achievement of the performance condition, as determined in the sole discretion of the CNG Committee, prorated based on a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of full calendar months the participant has been employed from the grant date through the date of such termination of service, and the denominator of which is 36; provided that the participant must have been employed by the Company for at least twelve (12) months following the grant date of the PSUs.

Beginning with RSUs and PSUs granted to the NEOs in 2022, the award agreements provide for an additional termination scenario of “Enhanced Retirement,” as defined and further discussed below. The RSU and PSU award agreements for RSUs and PSUs granted prior to 2022 were not amended to provide for an Enhanced Retirement termination scenario, and therefore only include a regular Retirement termination scenario.

The RSU award agreements applicable to the NEOs for RSUs granted beginning in 2022 provide that in the event of a termination of service due to the participant’s death following the first anniversary of the grant date, then a pro rata portion of the RSUs will vest on the termination date, determined as follows: (a) if the termination occurs between the first and second anniversaries of the grant date, the sum of (i) the number of RSUs that would have vested in the second vesting period, multiplied by a fraction equal to the full calendar months the participant has been employed from the grant date through the date of termination (the “Service Months”), over 24, plus (ii) the number of RSUs that would have vested in the third vesting period, multiplied by a fraction equal to the number of Service Months over 36; and (b) if the termination occurs between the second and third anniversaries of the grant date, the number of RSUs that would have vested in the third vesting period, multiplied by a fraction equal to the number of Service Months over 36.

In the event of a participant’s Retirement after the first anniversary of the grant date, a pro rata portion of the RSUs with respect to the applicable vesting period in which termination occurs will vest on the first scheduled vesting date following termination, based on the number of full calendar months the participant has been employed in the applicable vesting period through the date of termination, over 12. In the event of a participant’s Enhanced Retirement (a) on or after the six month anniversary of the grant date but prior to the first anniversary of the grant date, a pro rata portion of the RSUs will vest on each scheduled vesting date as follows (i) on the first vesting date following termination, the number of RSUs that would have vested in the first vesting period, multiplied by a fraction equal to the number of Service Months over 12, (ii) on the second vesting date following termination, the number of RSUs that would have vested in the second vesting period, multiplied by a fraction equal to the number of Service Months over 24, and (iii) on the final vesting date, the number of RSUs that would have vested in the third vesting period, multiplied by a fraction equal to the number of Service Months over 36; and (b) on or after the first anniversary of the grant date, the RSUs will remain outstanding and will vest on each regularly scheduled vesting date.

Table of Contents

The PSU award agreements applicable to the NEOs for PSUs granted beginning in 2022 provide that in the event of a termination of service due to the participant’s death following the first anniversary of the grant date, a pro rata portion will vest on the termination date, based on the number of PSUs that the CNG Committee determines would have vested based on the likely level of achievement of the performance conditions, multiplied by a fraction equal to the number of Service Months over 36. In the event of a participant’s Retirement that occurs after the first anniversary of the grant date, the PSUs will remain outstanding and a pro rata portion will vest on the scheduled vesting date, based on the number of achieved PSUs, multiplied by a fraction equal to the number of Service Months over 36. In the event of a participant’s Enhanced Retirement (a) after the six months anniversary of the grant date but prior to the first anniversary of the grant date, the PSUs will remain outstanding and a pro rata portion will vest on the scheduled vesting date, based on the number of achieved PSUs, multiplied by a fraction equal to the number of Service Months over 36; and (b) after the first anniversary of the grant date, the PSUs will remain outstanding and all achieved PSUs will vest on the scheduled vesting date.

For purposes of these award agreements:

a.“Retirement” means a participant’s voluntary termination of service on or after the earliest to occur of: (i) the date on which such participant attains age 62, (ii) the date on which such participant attains age 55 and has completed 10 years of service with the Company or an affiliate (or predecessor thereof) or (iii) such participant’s age plus years of service with the Company or an affiliate (or predecessor thereof) totals at least 70.

b.“Enhanced Retirement” means: (A) the participant has a voluntary termination of service on or after the earliest to occur of: (1) the date on which such participant attains age 62, (2) the date on which such participant attains age 55 and has completed 15 years of service with the Company or an affiliate (or predecessor thereof) or (3) such participant’s age plus years of service with the Company or an affiliate (or predecessor thereof) totals at least 75; (B) the participant enters into an extended restrictive covenant agreement; (C) the participant is not eligible to receive, and does not receive, any severance payments or benefits; and (D) the participant provides the Company with at least six months’ advance written notice of the participant’s retirement.

The extended vesting provisions are further subject to the participant’s continuous compliance with applicable non-competition and other restrictive covenant agreements.

The Equity Incentive Plan provides that in the event of a Change in Control (defined below), outstanding equity awards shall immediately vest and settle. The PSU award agreements applicable to the NEOs provide that the number of unvested PSUs that will vest effective as of the date of such Change in Control will be based on the likely level of achievement of the performance ~~condition,~~conditions or, with respect to PSUs for which the performance period was completed, based on the actual level of achievement of the performance conditions, in each case as determined in the sole discretion of the CNG Committee.

Table of Contents

The Equity Incentive Plan defines “Change in Control” generally as the occurrence of any one or more of the following events:

(i) a direct or indirect change in ownership or control of the Company effected through one transaction or a series of related transactions within a 12-month period, whereby any person other than the Company, directly or indirectly acquires or maintains beneficial ownership of securities of the Company constituting more than 50% of the total combined voting power of the Company’s equity securities issued and outstanding immediately after such acquisition;

(ii) at any time during a period of 24 consecutive months, individuals who at the beginning of such period constituted the Board cease for any reason to constitute a majority of members of the Board, with certain exceptions;

(iii) the consummation of a merger, amalgamation or consolidation of the Company or any of its subsidiaries with any other corporation or entity, other than a merger, amalgamation or consolidation which would result in the voting securities of the Company issued and outstanding immediately prior to such merger, amalgamation or consolidation continuing to represent (either by remaining issued and outstanding or being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity or, if applicable, the ultimate parent thereof) at least 50% of the combined voting power and total fair market value of the securities of the Company or such surviving entity or parent issued and outstanding immediately after such merger, amalgamation or consolidation; or

(iv) the consummation of any sale, lease, exchange or other transfer to any person (other than an affiliate of the Company), in one transaction or a series of related transactions within a 12-month period, of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries.

~~Table of Contents~~

Potential Payments Table

The table below reflects the estimated value of compensation and benefits payable to each of our NEOs upon the occurrence of certain events. The amounts in the table are based on a hypothetical termination of employment or change in control date on December 31, ~~2020.~~

2023.

Termination
Without
Cause Prior
to a Sale of
Business

Termination
Without
Cause or
for Good
Reason
Within
12 Months
Following
a Sale of
Business

Termination
Due to
Death or
Retirement

Change in
Control

Name/Benefits

($)

($)

($)

($)

Lance Mitchell

Base salary

1,550,000

3,100,000

—

—

Annual bonus

1,782,500

1,782,500

—

—

Health benefits

11,055

11,055

—

—

Value of accelerated RSUs⁽¹⁾

—

—

739,370

2,761,457

Value of accelerated PSUs⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾

—

—

242,656

970,622

Total

3,343,555

4,893,555

982,026

3,732,079

Michael Graham

Base salary

822,677

1,645,354

—

—

Annual bonus

—

487,616

—

—

Health benefits

13,668

13,668

—

—

Value of accelerated RSUs⁽¹⁾

—

—

79,190

761,424

Value of accelerated PSUs⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾

—

—

75,002

300,009

Total

836,345

2,146,638

154,192

1,061,433

As discussed above, Mr. Graham stepped down from his position as Chief Financial Officer and moved into an advisory role to assist with Mr. Huckins’ transition on November 13, 2023. Mr. Graham has remained a full-time employee, with the same compensation and under the same terms and conditions as his Employment Agreement, until his retirement, which is planned for March 31, 2024. Mr. Graham is eligible for Enhanced Retirement, and will receive the following in connection with his retirement:

•The 6,155 outstanding RSUs granted on February 1, 2022 will remain outstanding and vest on their regularly scheduled vesting date of February 1, 2025. The value of these RSUs (based on the closing price for our common stock on December 29, 2023, the last trading day of 2023) was $165,200.

•The 12,423 outstanding RSUs granted on February 1, 2023 will remain outstanding and vest on their regularly scheduled vesting dates of February 1, 2025 and February 1, 2026, as Mr. Graham stayed employed until after the one year anniversary of the grant date. The value of these RSUs (based on the closing price for our common stock on December 29, 2023, the last trading day of 2023) was $333,433.

•The 32,610 earned PSUs granted on February 1, 2023 will remain outstanding and vest on their regularly scheduled vesting date of February 1, 2026, as Mr. Graham stayed employed until after the one year anniversary of the grant date. The value of these PSUs (based on the closing price for our common stock on December 29, 2023, the last trading day of 2023) was $875,252.

As described above, Mr. Graham also received a payout of $854,137 in connection with the 2023 AIP.

Table of Contents


	Termination Without Cause Prior to a Sale of Business		Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason Within 12 Months Following a Sale of Business		Termination Due to Death or Retirement		Termination Due to Enhanced Retirement⁽³⁾		Change in Control
Name/Benefits	($)		($)		($)		($)		($)
Lance Mitchell
Base salary		1,550,000		3,100,000		—		—		—
Annual bonus		1,782,500		1,782,500		—		—		—
Health benefits		10,778		10,778		—		—		—
Value of RSUs⁽¹⁾		—		—		1,393,935		2,646,719		3,414,209
Value of PSUs⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾		—		—		—		933,119		3,053,855
Total		3,343,278		4,893,278		1,393,935		3,579,838		6,468,064
Scott Huckins
Base salary		675,000		1,350,000		—		—		—
Annual bonus		—		506,250		—		—		—
Health benefits		16,187		16,187		—		—		—
Value of RSUs⁽¹⁾		—		—		—		—		1,520,405
Value of PSUs⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾		—		—		—		—		—
Total		691,187		1,872,437		—		—		1,520,405
Rachel Bishop
Base salary		541,000		1,082,000		—		—		—
Annual bonus		—		351,650		—		—		—
Health benefits		16,236		16,236		—		—		—
Value of RSUs⁽¹⁾		—		—		244,727		478,396		623,037
Value of PSUs⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾		—		—		—		175,856		575,584
Total		557,236		1,449,886		244,727		654,252		1,198,621
Judith Buckner
Base salary		525,000		1,050,000		—		—		—
Annual bonus		—		341,250		—		—		—
Health benefits		11,103		11,103		—		—		—
Value of RSUs⁽¹⁾		—		—		220,222		443,612		583,985
Value of PSUs⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾		—		—		—		170,676		558,567
Total		536,103		1,402,353		220,222		614,288		1,142,552

Table of Contents

Potential Payments Table (cont.)

Termination
Without
Cause Prior
to a Sale of
Business

Termination
Without
Cause
or for Good
Reason
Within 12
Months
Following a
Sale of
Business

Termination
Due to Death
or Retirement

Change in
Control

Name/Benefits

($)

($)

($)

($)

Stephan Pace

Base salary

463,710

927,420

—

—

Annual bonus

—

274,849

—

—

Health benefits

13,846

13,846

—

—

Value of accelerated RSUs⁽¹⁾

—

—

44,679

429,362

Value of accelerated PSUs⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾

—

—

42,319

169,275

Total

477,556

1,216,115

86,998

598,637

Craig Cappel

Base salary

477,405

954,810

—

—

Annual bonus

—

282,967

—

—

Health benefits

13,846

13,846

—

—

Value of accelerated RSUs⁽¹⁾

—

—

46,003

442,039

Value of accelerated PSUs⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾

—

—

43,573

174,292

Total

491,251

1,251,623

89,576

616,331

Rachel Bishop

Base salary

424,360

848,720

—

—

Annual bonus

—

251,526

—

—

Health benefits

16,666

16,666

—

—

Value of accelerated RSUs⁽¹⁾

—

—

40,851

392,773

Value of accelerated PSUs⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾

—

—

38,692

154,766

Total

441,026

1,116,912

79,543

547,539

~~(1)~~

~~The~~ RSU and PSU award agreements provide that the participant must have been employed by the Company for at least 12 months following the grant date of the applicable RSUs or PSUs for the RSUs and PSUs to vest upon the occurrence of the specified events. Since the RSUs and PSUs held by each NEO as of December 31, 2020 were granted following our IPO in early 2020, none of those awards had been held longer than 12 months from the respective grant dates, and therefore if the ~~specified events had actually occurred on December 31, 2020, none of the RSUs or PSUs held by any of the NEOs would have vested and the related dollar values in the table would have been zero. However, in order to provide more fulsome disclosure, th~~e value of accelerated RSUs and PSUs in the table assumes such awards had been outstanding for at least 12 months following the grant date and was determined by multiplying the number of unvested RSUs and PSUs by $30.04, the closing price for our common stock on December 31, 2020.

~~(2)~~

~~The terms of the PSUs provide that the number of PSUs for which vesting would be accelerated would be determined based on the~~ likely level of achievement of the performance conditions as determined by the CNG Committee. For purposes of this table, the number of PSUs that would vest upon the specified event is assumed to be at the target level of performance.


	Termination Without Cause Prior to a Sale of Business		Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason Within 12 Months Following a Sale of Business		Termination Due to Death or Retirement		Termination Due to Enhanced Retirement⁽³⁾		Change in Control
Name/Benefits	($)		($)		($)		($)		($)
Lisa Smith
Base salary		500,000		1,000,000		—		—		—
Annual bonus		—		325,000		—		—		—
Health benefits		11,262		11,262		—		—		—
Value of RSUs⁽¹⁾		—		—		218,531		433,224		566,941
Value of PSUs⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾		—		—		—		162,543		531,942
Total		511,262		1,336,262		218,531		595,767		1,098,883

(1)The value of RSUs and PSUs is determined by multiplying the number of unvested units for which vesting would be accelerated or that would continue to vest following the specified event by $26.84, the closing price for our common stock on December 29, 2023, the last trading day of 2023.

(2)As of December 31, 2023, the NEOs held PSUs that were granted in 2023 with a one-year performance period of 2023. Following 2023, the CNG Committee determined the number of PSUs that were earned by each NEO. That number of earned PSUs was utilized to determine the value of PSUs reflected in this table.

(3)The value of the RSUs and PSUs in this column consist of the value of the RSUs and PSUs granted in 2022 and 2023 that would vest or continue to vest upon an Enhanced Retirement, plus the value of the RSUs granted in 2021 that would vest or continue to vest upon a Retirement, since an Enhanced Retirement under the 2022 and 2023 RSUs would qualify as a Retirement under the 2021 RSUs.

Table of Contents

CEO PAY RATIO

The following is a reasonable estimate of the ratio of the annual total compensation of Lance Mitchell, our Chief Executive Officer (our “CEO”), to the annual total compensation of the median of our other employees, together with an explanation of our methodology in calculating the same.

For 2023:

•The annual total compensation of our median employee was $65,556; and

•The annual total compensation of our CEO, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table included in this Proxy Statement, was $8,721,018.

Based on this information for 2023, we reasonably estimate that the ratio of our CEO’s annual total compensation to the annual total compensation of our median employee was 133:1. Our pay ratio estimate has been calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K.

For our 2023 pay ratio analysis, we determined that we could use the same median employee that we identified for our 2021 pay ratio analysis, as permitted by SEC rules. There has been no change in either our employee population or our employee compensation arrangements that we believe would significantly impact our 2023 pay ratio disclosure.

With respect to our median employee, we determined that employee’s total compensation, including any perquisites and other benefits, in the same manner that we determine the total compensation of our named executive officers for purposes of the Summary Compensation Table disclosed above.

Table of Contents

PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE

Please refer to the CD&A in its entirety for a full discussion on how the CNG Committee makes its decisions on executive compensation and our pay-for-performance compensation philosophy. The following table sets forth additional compensation information regarding our principal executive officer, Lance Mitchell (“PEO” or “CEO”), and our other NEOs (averaged), along with total shareholder return (“TSR”), net income and Adjusted EBIT performance results for our 2023, 2022, 2021 and 2020 fiscal years:


Year	Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO ($)	Compensation Actually Paid to PEO(1)(2) ($)	Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs(3) ($)	Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs(1)(2)(3) ($)	Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On:		Net Income ($m)	Adjusted EBIT(6) ($m)
					Company TSR(4) ($)	Peer Group TSR(4)(5) ($)
2023	8,721,018	9,414,595	2,171,986	2,291,678	105	120	298	512
2022	6,805,161	3,692,477	1,715,941	1,096,076	114	121	258	429
2021	5,940,377	3,389,548	1,480,706	1,022,817	116	131	324	492
2020	11,410,221	12,624,919	2,683,195	2,896,277	107	114	363	618

(1) To calculate compensation actually paid (“CAP”), the following amounts were deducted from and added to the Summary Compensation Table (“SCT”) total compensation for 2023 (the equity adjustments for 2020-2022 were set forth in the proxy statement for our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders):

PEO SCT Total to CAP Reconciliation


Year	SCT Total ($)	Deductions from SCT Total ($)(i)	Additions to SCT Total ($)(ii)	CAP ($)
		(i)	(ii)
2023	8,721,018	(4,105,334)	4,798,911	9,414,595

(i) Represents the following:


Year	Grant Date Fair Value of Covered Year Equity Awards ($)	Year-Over-Year Change in Fair Value of Prior Years' Awards Unvested at the End of Covered Year ($)	Change in Fair Value of Prior Years' Awards that Vested in Covered Year ($)	Fair Value at End of Prior Year of Prior Years' Awards that Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During the Covered Year ($)	Deductions from SCT Total ($)
2023	(3,875,014)	(195,274)	(35,046)	—	(4,105,334)

(ii) Represents the following:


Year	Fair Value of Covered Year Equity Awards at Covered Year End ($)	Additions to SCT Total ($)
2023	4,798,911	4,798,911

Table of Contents

Average Non-PEO NEO SCT Total to CAP Reconciliation


Year	SCT Total ($)	Deductions from SCT Total ($)(iii)	Additions to SCT Total ($)(iv)	CAP ($)
2023	2,171,986	(983,104)	1,102,796	2,291,678

(iii) Represents the following:


Year	Grant Date Fair Value of Covered Year Equity Awards ($)	Year-Over-Year Change in Fair Value of Prior Years' Awards Unvested at the End of Covered Year ($)	Change in Fair Value of Prior Years' Awards that Vested in Covered Year ($)	Fair Value at End of Prior Year of Prior Years' Awards that Failed to Meet Applicable Vesting Conditions During the Covered Year ($)	Aggregate Change in the Actuarial Present Value of the Accumulated Benefit Under all Defined Benefit and Actuarial Plans Reported in the SCT in Each Year ($)	Deductions from SCT Total ($)
2023	(944,946)	(30,524)	(4,716)	—	(2,918)	(983,104)

(iv) Represents the following:


Year	Fair Value of Covered Year Equity Awards at Covered Year End ($)	Additions to SCT Total ($)
2023	1,102,796	1,102,796

None of the NEOs are accruing benefits under a pension plan for services rendered in any of the covered years, and therefore no additions are required for pension plan service cost in determining CAP.

(2) Assumptions used in the valuation of equity awards for purposes of calculating compensation actually paid were the same as at the grant date except for adjusting for expected and actual performance of PSUs at each measurement date.

(3) The non-PEO NEOs represent the following individuals for each of the years shown:

•2023: Scott Huckins, CFO, Rachel Bishop, President, Hefty Tableware, Judith Buckner, President, Reynolds Cooking & Baking, Lisa Smith, President, Hefty Waste and Storage and Michael Graham, former CFO;

•2022: Michael Graham, CFO, Rachel Bishop, President, Hefty Tableware, Judith Buckner, President, Reynolds Cooking & Baking, Lisa Smith, President, Hefty Waste and Storage and Craig Cappel, former President, Reynolds Cooking & Baking;

•2021: Michael Graham, CFO, Craig Cappel, former President, Reynolds Cooking & Baking, Stephan Pace, President, Sales and Chief Customer Officer and Steve Estes, Chief Administrative Officer; and

•2020: Michael Graham, CFO, Rachel Bishop, President, Hefty Tableware, Craig Cappel, former President, Reynolds Cooking & Baking and Stephan Pace, President, Sales and Chief Customer Officer.

(4) Total shareholder return as calculated based on a fixed investment of $100 measured from the market close on January 31, 2020 (the first trading day of our stock) through and including the end of the fiscal year for each year reported in the table.

(5) The complete list of our peer group used for the TSR calculation is the same group of companies used by us for purposes of the performance graph in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and comprises: Church & Dwight Co., Inc., The Clorox Company, Colgate-Palmolive Company, Energizer Holdings, Inc., Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Newell Brands Inc., The Procter & Gamble Company, The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. and WD-40 Company.

(6) Our company-selected measure, which is the measure we believe represents the most important financial performance measure not otherwise presented in the table above that we use to link Compensation Actually Paid to our NEOs for fiscal 2023 to our company’s performance is Adjusted EBIT. Adjusted EBIT is a non-GAAP financial measure. Refer to Appendix A to this Proxy Statement for a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to the corresponding GAAP measure.

Table of Contents

Financial Performance Measures

The most important financial performance measures used by us to link executive compensation actually paid to the Company’s NEOs, for 2023, to our performance are as follows:


Most Important Performance Measures
• Adjusted EBIT
• Revenue
• Adjusted Earnings per Share
• Adjusted EBITDA(1)
• Free Cash Flow

(1) We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income calculated in accordance with GAAP, plus the sum of income tax expense, net interest expense, depreciation and amortization and IPO and separation-related costs, as well as other non-recurring costs.

Relationship between Pay and Performance

The charts below present a graphical comparison of Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and the average Compensation Actually Paid to our Non-PEO NEOs set forth in the Pay Versus Performance table above, as compared against the following performance measures: our (1) TSR and peer group TSR, (2) net income, and (3) Adjusted EBIT. Refer to Appendix A to this Proxy Statement for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBIT to the corresponding GAAP measure for the periods presented.

Compensation Actually Paid vs. Cumulative Company TSR and Cumulative Peer Group TSR

(1) Regular CAP consists of CAP amounts in each year, other than IPO-Related CAP in 2020. IPO-Related CAP consists of the 2020 amounts awarded pursuant to IPO Success Transition Bonuses and the IPO RSUs granted on February 4, 2020.

Table of Contents

Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income

Compensation Actually Paid vs. Adjusted EBIT

Table of Contents

EQUITY ~~COMPENSATIO~~NCOMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table sets forth information concerning our equity compensation plans as of December 31, ~~2020.~~

2023.

Plan Category

Number of
securities
to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options,
warrants and
rights (a)

Weighted-
average
exercise price
of outstanding
options,
warrants and
rights (b)

Number of
securities
remaining
available
for future
issuance
under
equity
compensation
plans
(excluding
securities
reflected in
column (a)) (c)

Equity compensation plans
approved by security holders⁽¹⁾

407,520

⁽²⁾

—

⁽³⁾

10,077,505

⁽⁴⁾
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders

—

—

—

Total

407,520

⁽²⁾

—

⁽³⁾

10,077,505

⁽⁴⁾

~~(1)~~

~~Consists of the Equity Incentive Plan.~~


Plan Category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a)			Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b)			Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders⁽¹⁾		806,037	⁽²⁾		—	⁽³⁾		9,370,027	⁽⁴⁾
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		—			—			—
Total		806,037	⁽²⁾		—	⁽³⁾		9,370,027	⁽⁴⁾

~~(2)~~

Consists of RSUs and PSUs. The number of PSUs included in these amounts consists of the maximum number of shares that participants are eligible to receive if applicable performance metrics are fully achieved under the terms of the PSUs.

(1)Consists of the Equity Incentive Plan.

~~(3)~~

RSUs and PSUs will be settled in shares of our common stock on a one-for-one basis at no additional cost and do not have an exercise price. As a result, there is no weighted average exercise price to be included in this column.

~~(4)~~

Consists of shares available for awards under the Equity Incentive Plan as of December 31, 2020. The number of PSUs included in the amounts in this column removes from the number of securities remaining available for future issuance the maximum number of shares which the participant is eligible to receive if applicable performance metrics are fully achieved with respect to the PSUs.

(2)Consists of RSUs and PSUs. Includes 344,852 PSUs granted in 2023, which was the number of PSUs earned based on the level of achievement of the performance conditions determined to be 175% of target.

(3)RSUs and PSUs will be settled in shares of our common stock on a one-for-one basis at no additional cost and do not have an exercise price. As a result, there is no weighted average exercise price to be included in this column.

(4)Consists of shares available for awards under the Equity Incentive Plan as of December 31, 2023.

Table of Contents

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BE~~NEFICIAL~~BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth the number of shares of common stock of the Company beneficially owned as of March ~~31, 2021,~~1, 2024, by: (i) each director; (ii) each of the NEOs; (iii) all current executive officers and directors as a group; and (iv) persons known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock.

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Except as noted by footnote, and subject to community property laws where applicable, we believe based on the information provided to the Company that the persons and entities named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our common stock shown as beneficially owned by them.

The table lists applicable percentage ownership based on ~~209,757,984~~210,131,161 shares of our common stock outstanding as of March ~~31, 2021.~~1, 2024. The number of shares beneficially owned includes shares of our common stock that each person has the right to acquire within 60 days of March ~~31, 2021,~~1, 2024, including upon the vesting and settlement of RSUs. These shares are deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of outstanding shares of our common stock owned by such person but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of outstanding shares of our common stock owned by any other person.

Name of beneficial owner

Shares of
Common
Stock
Owned⁽¹⁾

Percent
of class

Directors:

Lance Mitchell

36,541

*

Gregory Cole

10,000

*

Thomas Degnan

—

*

Helen Golding

—

*

Marla Gottschalk

4,335

*

Allen Hugli

5,000

*

Richard Noll⁽²⁾

21,502

*

Ann Ziegler

—

*

Named Executive Officers:

Michael Graham

7,959

*

Stephan Pace

3,216

*

Craig Cappel

3,257

*

Rachel Bishop

2,942

*

All executive officers and directors as a group
(15 individuals)

107,300

*

Greater than 5% Stockholders:

PFL⁽³⁾

155,455,000

74
%

Name of beneficial owner

Shares of
Common
Stock
Owned

Percent
of class

Directors:

Lance Mitchell

163,750

Gregory Cole

10,000

Helen Golding

—

Marla Gottschalk⁽¹⁾

18,298

Allen Hugli

5,000

Christine Montenegro McGrath

—

Richard Noll⁽²⁾

42,173

Ann Ziegler⁽³⁾

10,052

Named Executive Officers:

Scott Huckins

—

Rachel Bishop

24,757

Judith Buckner

21,772

Lisa Smith

14,450

Michael Graham

48,796

All current executive officers and directors as a group
(22 individuals)

422,299

Greater than 5% Stockholders:

PFL⁽⁴⁾

155,455,000

74.0

Allspring Global Investments Holdings, LLC⁽⁵⁾

12,891,557

6.1

*Less than 1%.

~~(1)~~

~~Does not include any RSUs or PSUs held by executive officers and directors, as none of those outstanding awards are scheduled to vest within 60 days following March 31, 2021.~~

~~(2)~~

~~Includes 6,502 shares held by Mr. Noll directly and 15,000 shares held in revocable living trust in which Mr. Noll is the trustee.~~

Table of Contents

~~(3)~~

PFL is wholly-owned by Packaging Holdings Limited (“PHL”), which is wholly-owned by Mr. Graeme Hart. The principal business address of PFL, PHL, and Mr. Hart is c/o Rank Group Limited, Floor 9, 148 Quay Street, Auckland, 1010 New Zealand.

(1)Includes 13,025 shares held directly and 5,273 RSUs that are scheduled to vest immediately prior to the Annual Meeting.

(2)Includes 19,537 shares held by Mr. Noll directly, 15,000 shares held in a revocable living trust in which Mr. Noll is the trustee and 7,636 RSUs that are scheduled to vest immediately prior to the Annual Meeting.

(3)Includes 10,052 shares held directly. Excludes 5,273 RSUs that are scheduled to vest immediately prior to the Annual Meeting, but for which Ms. Ziegler has deferred settlement until two years following the cessation of her service as a director.

(4)PFL is wholly-owned by Packaging Holdings Limited (“PHL”), which is wholly-owned by Mr. Graeme Hart. The principal business address of PFL, PHL, and Mr. Hart is c/o Rank Group Limited, Floor 9, 148 Quay Street, Auckland, 1010 New Zealand.

(5)Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 12, 2024 by (a) Allspring Global Investments Holdings, LLC that it has sole voting power with respect to 12,215,232 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 12,891,557 shares; (b) Allspring Global Investments, LLC that it has sole voting power with respect to 1,630,758 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 12,810,978 shares; and (c) Allspring Funds Management, LLC that it has sole voting power with respect to 10,584,474 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 80,579 shares. Further, based on Forms 13F filled on January 25, 2024 by the reporting persons, it appears that, in the aggregate, their holdings total 12,891,557 shares of our common stock. The principal business address of the reporting persons is 1415 Vantage Park Dr., 3rd Floor, Charlotte, NC 28203.

Table of Contents

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS

Prior to our separation from PEI and our initial public offering (“IPO”), we operated as part of PEI Group’s ~~(previously known as RGHL Group)~~ broader corporate organization rather than as a stand-alone public company. PEI Group and Rank have performed or supported various corporate services for us, and we have engaged in various transactions with PEI Group. In connection with our IPO, we entered into new agreements with the PEI Group and Rank. We amended these agreements in 2023. The prices and other terms of these new agreements were negotiated on what we believe to be an arm’s-length basis. The ~~historical (pre-IPO) and current~~ arrangements under which we ~~had and~~ have transacted with PEI Group and Rank during the year ending December 31, 2023 are described below.

~~Historical~~

Arrangements

~~Defined Benefit Plans~~

~~Prior to our separation from PEI Group and IPO, certain of our employees participated in a defined benefit plan sponsored by a member of PEI Group.~~

~~Administrative Services and Lease~~

PEI Group has provided us certain administrative services, including executive management, human resources, procurement, finance, legal, tax and information technology services, and use of space in our headquarters building in Lake Forest, Illinois. Total costs allocated to us for these functions were $2 million for 2020. These amounts include costs of $1 million that were not historically allocated to us as part of PEI Group's normal monthly reporting process. In addition, costs of $2 million were allocated to us related to the IPO process that cannot be deferred and offset against the IPO proceeds, as well as costs related to our preparations to operate as a stand-alone public company.

~~Repurchase of Accounts Receivables Previously Sold to PEI Group~~

On January 30, 2020, we repurchased all of the U.S. accounts receivable that we previously sold through PEI Group’s securitization facility for $264 million, $240 million of which was settled in cash and the remaining amount used to settle certain current related party receivables. The cash to purchase these receivables was provided by an increase in related party borrowings, which was subsequently settled.

~~Intercompany Indebtedness~~

Our outstanding borrowings, net of deferred financing transaction costs and original issue discounts plus accrued interest incurred under the PEI Group Credit Agreement were reallocated to an entity within PEI Group and on February 4, 2020, we were fully and unconditionally released from the security and guarantee arrangements relating to PEI Group’s borrowings. This reallocation resulted in a payment to PEI Group of $8 million for accrued interest and an increase of $2,001 million in related party borrowings, which was subsequently settled.

On February 4, 2020, we repaid $3,627 million of related party borrowings and $22 million of related party accrued interest owed to PEI Group and capitalized, as additional paid-in capital without the issuance of any additional shares, the remaining $831 million balance of the related party borrowings owed to PEI Group.

~~Transfers of Property, Plant and Equipment~~

In 2019, in preparation for our IPO the ownership or lease of certain plants, warehouses, equipment (including manufacturing lines), information technology assets and inventory, were transferred to us from PEI Group with a net book value in an amount totaling $110 million.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Current Arrangements~~

Supply, Warehousing and Freight Agreements with Pactiv

We have entered into supply agreements to continue selling products to and buying products from Pactiv. These agreements will expire onover a variety of periods through December 31, ~~2024.~~2027. Certain of the products we manufacture and sell to Pactiv are made using equipment in our plants that is owned by Pactiv, and certain of the products that Pactiv manufactures and sells to us are made using equipment in Pactiv’s plants that is owned by us. Under the supply agreements, we and Pactiv agree to maintain the other party’s equipment that is in such party’s plants, provided that any required capital expenditures related to such equipment are the equipment owner’s responsibility. We have (i) sold products to Pactiv, primarily aluminum foil and aluminum foil containers, and (ii) purchased products from Pactiv, primarily tableware. For ~~2020,~~2023, revenues from products sold to Pactiv were ~~$116~~$83 million and we paid ~~$330~~$381 million for purchases from Pactiv.

We have entered into a warehousing and freight services agreement with Pactiv to continue storing many of our finished goods in warehouses operated by Pactiv and to provide certain freight services for shipments from our plants to our warehouses (including Pactiv warehouses) and from our warehouses to our customers. The term of the warehousing and freight services under the agreement will vary by ~~location. The term~~location, with a final termination date of ~~the freight services under the agreement is for approximately three years.~~December 31, 2024. For ~~2020,~~2023, Pactiv charged us freight and warehousing costs of ~~$80~~$37 million.

~~Transition Services Agreements~~

~~We have entered into three Transition Services Agreements (“TSAs”) with members of PEI Group and Rank:~~

A TSA whereby PEI Group will continue to provide certain administrative services to us, including information technology service; accounting, treasury, financial reporting and transaction support; human resources; procurement; tax, legal and compliance related services; and other corporate services. These services will be consistent with administrative services provided to us by PEI Group prior to our IPO and the charges are at forecasted cost or current cost plus margin. In addition, we will provide certain services to PEI Group, consistent with services provided by us to PEI Group prior to our IPO, which are also charged at current cost plus margin. Additionally, we have agreed that at each other’s request, certain tax, financial and other information will be provided to enable preparation of tax and financial reports of the respective parties and for other business purposes.

A TSA whereby Rank provides certain administrative services to us, including financial reporting, consulting and compliance, insurance procurement and human resources support, legal and corporate secretarial support and related services, to be charged at an agreed hourly rate, and we will provide, at Rank’s request, certain historical tax and financial information to enable Rank to prepare certain of its tax and financial reports. These services are also charged at an agreed hourly rate.

Leases

A TSA for our Red Bluff, California and Huntersville, North Carolina facilities, acquired from Pactiv in 2019, whereby Pactiv provides certain services to us, including tooling and engineering support, financial services, procurement services, and environmental, health and safety services, charged at an agreed rate.

The services provided under these TSAs will terminate within 24, 24, and 12 months, respectively (excluding the provision of information), provided that the party receiving services may terminate certain specified services early.

~~Leases~~

We lease our corporate headquarters in Lake Forest, IL from Pactiv. We occupy approximately 70,000 square feet at market rent with a term of ten years, beginning January 1, 2020, with two five-year renewal options. We amended the lease agreement by adding approximately 32,000 square feet at market rent, beginning February 1, 2021, at our corporate headquarters. We also lease approximately 26,000 square feet in Pactiv’s Canandaigua, New York facility for certain research and development activities. The Canandaigua lease is at market rent and has a term of five years, beginning January 1, 2020, provided we have the right to terminate the lease on six months’ notice.

Table of Contents

Policies and Procedures for Transactions with Related Persons

We have adopted a Related Person Transaction Policy that provides that our executive officers, directors, nominees for election as a director, beneficial owners of 5% or more of our common stock and any members of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons are not permitted to enter into a related party transaction with us without the approval or ratification of a designated committee of our board of directors (which will initially be the Audit Committee) or other committee designated by our board of directors made up solely of independent directors. Any request for us to enter into a transaction with an executive officer, director, nominee for election as a director, beneficial owner of 5% or more of our common stock or any member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons, in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and such person would have a direct or indirect interest, must be presented to our Audit Committee or other committee of independent directors for review to determine whether the related party involved has a direct or indirect material interest in the transaction. In reviewing any such proposal, our Audit Committee or other committee of independent directors are to consider the relevant facts of the transaction, including the risks, costs and benefits to us and whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During ~~2020,~~2023, the members of our CNG Committee were Gregory Cole, ~~Thomas Degnan~~Helen Golding and Richard Noll, none of whom is or has been our current or former officer or employee or was involved in a relationship requiring disclosure as an interlocking director or under Item 404 of Regulation S-K.

Table of Contents

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS A~~BOUT~~ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

The following questions and answers are intended to address briefly some commonly asked questions regarding the Annual Meeting and the matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting or at any adjournments or postponements thereof. We urge you to read the remainder of this Proxy Statement carefully because the information in this section does not provide all information that might be important to you. Please refer to the more detailed information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement and the documents referred to in this Proxy Statement, which you should read carefully.

What are the purposes of the Annual Meeting?

The Annual Meeting is being held for the purposes of considering and taking action with respect to the following:

~~to elect three directors to serve until the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders;~~

~~to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2021;~~

1. to elect three directors to serve until the 2027 Annual Meeting of Stockholders;

to ~~approve, on~~ an ~~advisory basis, the 2020 compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in the accompanying proxy statement;~~

2. to approve an amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to allow for exculpation of officers as permitted by Delaware law;

~~to vote, on an advisory basis, on the frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers; and~~

~~to transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or at any and all adjournments or postponements thereof.~~

3. to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2024;

4. to approve, on an advisory basis, the 2023 compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement; and

5. to transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or at any and all adjournments or postponements thereof.

How can I participate in the Annual Meeting?

The Annual Meeting will be a completely virtual meeting. There will be no physical meeting location.

To participate in the Annual Meeting, visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/~~REYN2021~~REYN2024 and enter the 16-digit control number included on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. You may begin to log into the meeting platform beginning at 3:4:45 p.m., Central Time (“CT”), on ~~May 25, 2021.~~April 24, 2024. The meeting will begin promptly at 4:5:00 p.m. CT on ~~May 25, 2021.~~

April 24, 2024.

If you wish to submit a question during the meeting, log into the virtual meeting platform at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/~~REYN2021~~REYN2024, and follow the instructions in the virtual meeting platform for submitting a question. Questions must pertain to meeting matters, and the question and answer session will be subject to time constraints and rules of conduct. Questions regarding personal matters, including those related to employment, product issues or suggestions for product innovations, are not pertinent to meeting matters and therefore will not be answered.

If you encounter any technical difficulties with the virtual meeting platform on the Annual Meeting day either during the check-in or meeting time, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the virtual meeting platform log in page.

Table of Contents

Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

As of the close of business on March ~~31, 2021,~~1, 2024, the record date for determination of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, there were outstanding ~~209,757,984~~210,131,161 shares of our common stock, par value $0.001 per share, all of

~~Table of Contents~~

which are entitled to vote with respect to all matters to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting. Each stockholder of record is entitled to one vote for each share of our common stock held by such stockholder.

What constitutes a quorum for the Annual Meeting?

Our Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”) provide that a majority of the total voting power of all outstanding shares of stock generally entitled to vote at a meeting of stockholders, present in person or by proxy, will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. Shares that are voted “abstain” or “withheld” and broker “non-votes” are counted as present for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting.

What is the difference between a “stockholder of record” and a “street name” holder?

If your shares are registered directly in your name, you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares. If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, then the broker, bank or other nominee is considered to be the stockholder of record with respect to those shares, while you are considered the beneficial owner of those shares. In that case, your shares are said to be held in “street name.”

What are broker non-votes?

If your shares are held in “street name,” your broker, bank or other nominee is required to vote your shares according to your instructions. If you do not give instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee, it will still be able to vote your shares with respect to certain “discretionary” items, but will not be allowed to vote your shares with respect to “non-discretionary” items. Proposals 1, 32 and 4 are “non-discretionary” items. If you do not instruct your broker, bank or other nominee how to vote with respect to those proposals, it may not vote for those proposals, and those votes will be counted as broker “non-votes.” Proposal 23 is considered to be a discretionary item, and your broker, bank or other nominee will be able to vote on this proposal even if it does not receive instructions from you.

Table of Contents

What vote is required to approve each proposal?

The following sets forth the votes that are required from the holders of common stock to approve each of the proposals, and the impact of abstentions and broker non-votes:

Proposal
Number

Subject

~~Subject~~

Vote Required

Impact of Abstentions and
Broker Non-Votes, if any

Election of directors

Directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes present and entitled to vote. The nominees receiving the most FOR votes will be elected.

Abstentions and broker non-votes will not count as votes cast on the proposal and will not affect the outcome of the vote.

Approval of an amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to allow for exculpation of officers as permitted by Delaware law

The holders of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote must vote FOR to approve the proposal.

Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as votes AGAINST the proposal.

Ratification of appointment of independent registered public accounting firm

The holders of a majority of the votes cast at the meeting must vote FOR to approve the proposal.

Abstentions and broker non-votes will not count as votes cast on the proposal and will not affect the outcome of the vote.

Advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers

The holders of a majority of the votes cast at the meeting must vote FOR to approve the proposal.

Abstentions and broker non-votes will not count as votes cast on the proposal and will not affect the outcome of the vote.

~~Advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers~~

~~While advisory and non-binding, the frequency (every one, two or three years) that receives the most votes will be considered as representing the stockholders’ preference.~~

~~Abstentions and broker non-votes will not count as votes cast on the proposal and will not affect the outcome of the vote.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

What are the Board of Directors’ recommendations on how I should vote my shares?

•Proposal 1: FOR all nominees for election as directors.

•Proposal 22: FOR the approval of an amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to allow for exculpation of officers as permitted by Delaware law.

•Proposal 3: FOR the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, ~~2021.~~

2024.

•Proposal 34: FOR the advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers.

Table of Contents

~~Proposal 4:~~ ~~FOR ANNUAL~~ ~~for the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation.~~

How can I vote?

During the Meeting: If you plan to virtually attend the Annual Meeting and to vote during the meeting, we will provide you with an online ballot during the Annual Meeting through the virtual stockholder meeting platform at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/~~REYN2021~~REYN2024. To vote at the meeting, please follow the instructions on your proxy card. We recommend you vote by proxy even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. You can always change your vote at the meeting.

By Proxy: You may vote by proxy through the following means.

If you are a stockholder of record, you have several choices. You can vote your shares by proxy:

•by mailing a proxy card;

•via the internet; or

•over the telephone.

Please refer to the specific instructions set forth on the Notice or printed proxy materials. For security reasons, our electronic voting system has been designed to authenticate your identity as a stockholder.

If you hold your shares through a broker, bank or other nominee, the firm that holds your shares will provide you with materials and instructions for voting your shares.

If you complete and submit your proxy before the meeting, the persons named as proxies will vote the shares represented by your proxy in accordance with your instructions. If you submit a proxy without giving voting instructions, your shares will be voted in the manner recommended by the Board of Directors on all matters presented in this Proxy Statement, and as the persons named as proxies may determine in their discretion with respect to any other matters properly presented at the meeting.

Can I change my vote after I have submitted a proxy?

If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy by (1) following the instructions on the Notice or proxy card, as applicable, and entering a new vote by mail, over the internet or by phone by the time specified on the Notice or proxy card, as applicable, (2) sending a written notice of revocation to Reynolds Consumer Products, 1900 West Field Court, Lake Forest, IL 60045 Attention: Corporate Secretary,, or (3) attending the Annual Meeting and voting through the online platform (although attendance at the Annual Meeting will not in and of itself revoke a proxy).

If a broker, bank or other nominee holds your shares, you must contact them in order to find out how to revoke or change your vote.

~~Table of Contents~~

What happens if additional matters are presented at the Annual Meeting?

If any other matters are properly presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting, including, among other things, consideration of a motion to adjourn the Annual Meeting to another time or place (including, without limitation, for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies), the persons named as proxies will have discretion to vote on those matters in accordance with their best judgment. We do not currently anticipate that any other matters will be raised at the Annual Meeting.

Table of Contents

Who is paying for the cost of this proxy solicitation?

The Company is making this solicitation and will pay the entire cost of preparing and distributing the Notice and these proxy materials and soliciting votes. If you choose to access the proxy materials or vote over the internet, you are responsible for any internet access charges that you may incur. Our directors, officers and employees may, without compensation other than their regular compensation, solicit proxies through further mailings, personal conversations, facsimile transmissions, e-mails, or otherwise.

What is the deadline for submitting a stockholder proposal for the ~~2022~~2025 annual meeting?

Any stockholder proposal intended to be included in the ~~proxy statement~~Proxy Statement for the ~~2022~~2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must satisfy the SEC regulations under Rule 14a-8 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), and be received no later than ~~December 13, 2021.~~

November 12, 2024.

In addition, our Bylaws contain advance notice provisions requiring a stockholder who wishes to present a proposal or nominate directors at our next Annual Meeting of Stockholders (whether or not to be included in the ~~proxy statement)~~Proxy Statement) to comply with certain requirements, including providing timely written notice thereof in accordance with our Bylaws. To be timely for our ~~2022~~2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, any such proposal must be delivered in writing to our Secretary at our principal executive offices between the close of business on ~~November~~October 26, ~~2021~~2024 and ~~January~~December 25, ~~2022.~~2024. If the date of the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders is more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after the first anniversary of the ~~2021~~2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, then notice by the stockholder must be received by us no earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to the date of such Annual Meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of (1) 70 days prior to the date of such Annual Meeting or (2) the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made.

In addition to satisfying the foregoing requirements, in order to comply with the universal proxy rules, a stockholder who intends to solicit proxies in support of director nominees for election at the next annual meeting, other than the Company’s nominees, must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act no later than February 24, 2025.

The foregoing is subject to the Stockholders Agreement between the Company and PFL which provides that PFL has the right to nominate all of our directors so long as the Hart Entities beneficially own at least 50% of the outstanding shares of our common stock; a majority of our directors so long as they own at least 40% of our stock; and at least one director so long as they own at least 10% of our stock.

What is “householding”?

Some banks, brokers and other nominee record holders may be participating in the practice of “householding” proxy statements and annual reports. This means that only one copy of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, Proxy Statement and ~~2020~~2023 Annual Report to Stockholders, as applicable, is being delivered to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless we have received contrary instructions. We will promptly deliver a separate copy of any of these documents to you if you write to us at Reynolds Consumer Products Inc., 1~~900~~1900 W. Field Court, Lake Forest, Illinois 60045, Attention: Corporate Secretary or call us at (800) ~~879-5067~~.879-5067. If you want to receive separate copies of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, Proxy Statement, or ~~2020~~2023 Annual Report to Stockholders in the future, or if you are receiving multiple copies and would like to receive only one copy for your household, you should contact your broker, bank or other nominee record holder, or you may contact us at the above address or telephone number.

Table of Contents

AVAILABILITY OF FORM 10-K

Stockholders may receive, without charge, a copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2020,~~2023, as filed with the SEC, including financial statements (and excluding exhibits, which are available for a reasonable fee), by written request to our Corporate Secretary at Reynolds Consumer Products Inc., 1~~900~~1900 W. Field Court, Lake Forest, Illinois ~~60045~~.60045. Our Form 10-K is also available on our website in the “Investors—Financial Information –SEC Filings” section of our website at ~~www.reynoldsconsumerproducts.com~~www.ReynoldsConsumerProducts.com.

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of our previous filings under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act that may incorporate future filings (including this Proxy Statement, in whole or in part), the Audit Committee Report and the Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Report included in this Proxy Statement shall not be incorporated by reference in any such filings.

Table of Contents

APPENDIX A

RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL ~~MEASURE~~

MEASURES

Adjusted ~~EBITDA~~EBIT is referenced in this Proxy Statement and represents net income calculated in accordance with GAAP, plus the sum of income tax expense, net interest expense depreciation and amortization and further adjusted to exclude, as applicable, unrealized gains and losses on commodity derivatives, factoring discounts (pre-IPO), the allocated related party management fee (pre-IPO), and IPO and separation-related costs, as well as other non-recurring costs. Adjusted ~~EBITDA~~EBIT Growth in ~~2020~~2023 is ~~a comparison of~~the change in Adjusted ~~EBITDA~~EBIT in ~~2020~~2023 compared to Adjusted ~~EBITDA~~EBIT in ~~2019.~~

2022.

Adjusted ~~EBITDA~~EPS is areferenced in this Proxy Statement and represents earnings per share calculated in accordance with GAAP, plus IPO and separation-related costs and other non-recurring costs. Adjusted EPS Growth in 2023 is the change in Adjusted EPS in 2023 compared to Adjusted EPS in 2022.

Free Cash Flow is referenced in this Proxy Statement and represents net cash provided by operating activities in the period, calculated in accordance with GAAP, minus the amount of property, plant and equipment acquired in the period.

Adjusted EBIT, Adjusted EPS and Free Cash Flow are non-GAAP financial ~~measure~~measures and should be considered as supplemental in nature and isare not meant to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the related financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP. In addition, our non-GAAP financial measures may not be the same as or comparable to similar non-GAAP financial measures presented by other companies.

The following ~~table contains~~tables contain a reconciliation of Net Income and Net Income ~~Growth,~~Change, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, to Adjusted ~~EBITDA~~EBIT and Adjusted ~~EBITDA Growth~~EBIT Change for each of the periods indicated:

Year Ended December 31,

(In millions, except for %)

2020

2019

Change

% Change

Net Income – GAAP

$
363

$
225

$
138

61
%
Income tax expense

153

76

77

101
%
Interest expense, net

70

209

(139
)

(67
)%
Depreciation and amortization

99

91

8

9
%
Factoring discount

—

25

(25
)

(100
)%
Allocated related party management fee

—

10

(10
)

(100
)%
IPO and separation-related costs

31

31

—

—
%
Unrealized gains on derivatives

—

(9
)

9

(100
)%
Other

1

(3
)

4

(133
)%
Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP)

$
717

$
655

$
62

9
%


	Year Ended December 31,
(In millions, except for %)	2023		2022		Change		% Change
Net Income – GAAP	$	298	$	258	$	40		16	%
Income tax expense		95		80		15		19	%
Interest expense, net		119		76		43		57	%
IPO and separation-related costs		—		12		(12)		(100)	%
Other		—		3		(3)		N/M
Adjusted EBIT (Non-GAAP)	$	512	$	429	$	83		19	%

~~REYNOLDS CONSUMER PRODUCTS INC. 1900 W. FIELD COURT LAKE FOREST, IL 60045 VOTE BY INTERNET Before~~


	Year Ended December 31,
(In millions, except for %)	2022		2021		Change		% Change
Net Income – GAAP	$	258	$	324	$	(66)		(20)	%
Income tax expense		80		106		(26)		(25)	%
Interest expense, net		76		48		28		58	%
IPO and separation-related costs		12		14		(2)		(14)	%
Other		3		—		3		N/M
Adjusted EBIT (Non-GAAP)	$	429	$	492	$	(63)		(13)	%

N/M — Not meaningful

Table of Contents


	Year Ended December 31,
(In millions, except for %)	2021		2020		Change		% Change
Net Income – GAAP	$	324	$	363	$	(39)		(11)	%
Income tax expense		106		153		(47)		(31)	%
Interest expense, net		48		70		(22)		(31)	%
IPO and separation-related costs		14		31		(17)		(55)	%
Other		—		1		(1)		N/M
Adjusted EBIT (Non-GAAP)	$	492	$	618	$	(126)		(20)	%

N/M — Not meaningful

The ~~Meeting - Go~~following tables contain a reconciliation of Earnings per Share and Earnings per Share Change, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, to ~~www.proxyvote.com Use~~Adjusted Earnings per Share and Adjusted Earnings per Share Change for each of the ~~Internet~~periods indicated:


	Year Ended December 31, 2023					Year Ended December 31, 2022
(in millions, except for per share data)	Net Income		Diluted Shares	Diluted EPS		Net Income		Diluted Shares	Diluted EPS		Diluted EPS Change		Diluted EPS Change %
As Reported - GAAP	$	298	210	$	1.42	$	258	210	$	1.23	$	0.19	15	%
Adjustments:
IPO and separation-related costs	—		—	—		9		210	0.04		(0.04)		(100)	%
Other	—		—	—		2		210	0.01		(0.01)		(100)	%
Adjusted (Non-GAAP)	$	298	210	$	1.42	$	269	210	$	1.28	$	0.14	11	%


	Year Ended December 31, 2022					Year Ended December 31, 2021
(in millions, except for per share data)	Net Income		Diluted Shares	Diluted EPS		Net Income		Diluted Shares	Diluted EPS		Diluted EPS Change		Diluted EPS Change %
As Reported - GAAP	$	258	210	$	1.23	$	324	210	$	1.54	$	(0.31)	(20)	%
Adjustments:
IPO and separation-related costs	9		210	0.04		11		210	0.05		(0.01)		(20)	%
Other	2		210	0.01		—		—	—		0.01		100	%
Adjusted (Non-GAAP)	$	269	210	$	1.28	$	335	210	$	1.59	$	(0.31)	(20)	%

The following table contains a reconciliation of net cash provided by operating activities, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 24, 2021. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/REYN2021 You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 24, 2021. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: D37469-P50158 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY REYNOLDS CONSUMER PRODUCTS INC. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following: 1. Election of Directors Withhold For Nominees: 1a.Thomas Degnan 1b. Helen Golding 1c. Allen Hugli For Abstain Against The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposals: 2. To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firmFree Cash Flow for the year ending December 31, 2021. 3. To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers. 1 Year 2 Years Abstain 3 Years The Board of Directors recommends you vote 1 YEAR on the following proposal: 4. To vote, on an advisory basis, on the frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers. NOTE: In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote on any other business that may properly come before the meeting or at any and all adjournments or postponements thereof. Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date

period indicated:


	For the Year Ended December 31,
(in millions)	2023
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	644
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment	(104)
Free cash flow	$	540

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 25, 2021: This Proxy Statement and 2020 Annual Report to Stockholders are available at www.proxyvote.com. D37470-P50158 REYNOLDS CONSUMER PRODUCTS INC. Annual Meeting of Stockholders May 25, 2021 4:00 PM Central Time This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors The stockholder(s) hereby appoint(s) David Watson and Chris Mayrhofer, or either of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint (his/her) substitute, and hereby authorize(s) them to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this ballot, all of the shares of common stock of REYNOLDS CONSUMER PRODUCTS INC. that the stockholder(s) is/are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 4:00 p.m. Central Time on May 25, 2021, virtually at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/REYN2021, and any adjournment or postponement thereof. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted "FOR" each nominee for election as a director, "FOR" proposals 2 and 3, and "1 Year" on proposal 4. Continued and to be signed on reverse side

Your vote is important. To ensure that your vote is recorded promptly, please vote as soon as possible by submitting your proxy via the internet at the address listed on the Notice or proxy card, by telephone using the toll-free number listed on the proxy card or by signing, dating and returning the proxy card.
Lake Forest, Illinois March 12, 2024		By Order of the Board of Directors,

~~Lake Forest, Illinois~~ ~~April 12, 2021~~	/s/ David Watson David Watson General Counsel and Secretary


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY		1
Voting Matters and Board Recommendation		1
Director Nominees and Continuing Directors		2
Corporate Governance Highlights		3
Executive Compensation Best Practices		4
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS		4 5
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE		10 11
Director Independence		10 11
Board Leadership Structure		10 11
Stockholder Communications		10 11
Procedures for Selecting and Nominating Director Candidates		10 12
Board Meetings and Committees		11 13
Audit Committee		12 13
Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee		12 14
Risk Oversight		13 15
Board Evaluations		13 15
Environmental, Social & Governance Matters		13 15
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION		14 16
~~2020~~Stock Ownership Guidelines		17
2023 Director Compensation Table		15 17
PROPOSAL 2: APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO OUR AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO ALLOW FOR EXCULPATION OF OFFICERS AS PERMITTED BY DELAWARE LAW		18
PROPOSAL 3: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM		16 20
~~Audit Matters~~Auditor Fees		16 20
Pre-Approval Policy		16 21
Audit Committee Report		17 21
~~Proposal 3: advisory vote to approve the compensation of the named executive officers~~		18
PROPOSAL 4: ADVISORY VOTE TO ~~DETERMINE FREQUENCY~~APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF ~~FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON~~THE NAMED EXECUTIVE ~~COMPENSATION~~OFFICERS	19 22
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION		20 23
Compensation Discussion and Analysis		21 26
~~Elements of Compensation~~		24
~~Base Salary~~	25
~~Annual Incentive Compensation~~	25
~~Long-Term Incentive Compensation~~	27
~~Other Compensation—Retirement and Welfare Benefits~~	28
~~Employment Agreements~~	29
Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Report	31 39
Summary Compensation Table		32 40
~~2020~~2023 Grants of Plan-Based Awards		36 43
Outstanding Equity Awards at ~~2020~~ 202 3 Fiscal Year-End		37 44
~~2020~~Option Exercises and Stock Vested		45
2023 Pension Benefits		37 45
~~2020~~2023 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation		38 46
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control		38 47
CEO Pay Ratio		53
Pay Versus Performance		54
Equity Compensation Plan Information		43 58
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT		44 59
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS		45 61
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING		48 63
Availability of Form 10-K		52 68
Incorporation by Reference		52 68
APPENDIX A - RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL ~~MEASURE~~MEASURES		53 69


Voting Matter		Board Recommendation
Proposal 1: Election of three directors		FOR each nominee

Proposal 2: To approve an amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to allow for exculpation of officers as permitted by Delaware law		FOR

Proposal 2:3: To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, ~~2021~~ 2024		FOR

~~Proposal 3: To~~ ~~approve, on~~ an ~~advisory basis, the 2020 compensation of our named executive officers~~		~~FOR~~

Proposal 4: To approve, on an advisory basis, the ~~frequency~~ ~~of future advisory votes on the~~2023 compensation of our named executive officers	~~ANNUAL BASIS~~ FOR


Total Number of Directors	8
	Female	Male
Part I: Gender Identity
Directors	4	4
Part II: Demographic Background
Hispanic or Latinx	1	0
White	3	4


	2022 Annual PSUs				2022 Annual RSUs
	Grant Date Fair Value (Based on Probable Outcome)		Grant Date Fair Value (Based on Maximum Performance)		Grant Date Fair Value
Name	($)		($)		($)
Lance Mitchell		1,937,500		3,875,000		1,937,500

Rachel Bishop		354,375		708,750		354,375

Judith Buckner		320,606		641,212		320,636

Lisa Smith		320,606		641,212		320,636

Michael Graham		555,303		1,110,606		555,303

☐	~~Preliminary Proxy Statement~~
REYNOLDS CONSUMER PRODUCTS INC.

☐	~~Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.~~

	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash		Stock Awards		Total
Name	($)		($)⁽¹⁾		($)
Gregory Cole	$	—	$	—	$	—
Thomas Degnan		—		—		—
Helen Golding		—		—		—
Marla Gottschalk		130,000		130,007		260,007
Richard Noll		150,000		194,995		344,995
Ann Ziegler		27,500		43,339		70,839

Adjusted EBITDA Growth	Threshold			Target			Maximum
FY 2020 ($m)		590			662			708
% of FY 2019		90	%		101	%		108	%
Percentage Payout Level		25	%		100	%		200	%

Name	Target % of Base Salary			Target Dollar Amount
Lance Mitchell		115	%	$	1,782,500
Michael Graham		60	%		487,616
Stephan Pace		60	%		274,849
Craig Cappel		60	%		282,967
Rachel Bishop		60	%		251,526

Metric	Actual ($m / %)	Payout Attainment (%)			Weight (%)			Final Payout (%)
Adjusted EBITDA Growth (FY 2020 result / % of FY 2019) ⁽¹⁾	$ 717 / 109%		200	%		90	%		180	%
Working Capital⁽²⁾	N/A		200	%		10	%		20	%
Total									200	%

Name	2020 AIP Payment
Lance Mitchell	$	3,565,000
Michael Graham	$	975,233
Stephan Pace	$	549,698
Craig Cappel	$	565,934
Rachel Bishop	$	503,052


Metric	Actual	Attainment (%)			Weight (%)			Final Earned (%)
Adjusted EPS Growth (FY 2023 result / % of FY 2022)⁽¹⁾	$1.42 / 111%		150	%		50	%		75	%
Free Cash Flow (FY 2023 result, in millions)⁽¹⁾	$540		200	%		50	%		100	%
Total									175	%


Name						2023 PSUs Earned
Lance Mitchell						113,780
Scott Huckins						—
Rachel Bishop						21,445
Judith Buckner						20,811
Lisa Smith						19,819
Michael Graham						32,610

	2020 IPO RSUs		2020 Annual PSUs				2020 Annual RSUs
	Grant Date Fair Value		Grant Date Fair Value (Based on Probable Outcome)		Grant Date Fair Value (Based on Maximum Performance)		Grant Date Fair Value
Name	($)		($)		($)		($)
Lance Mitchell		1,549,990		969,007		1,938,014		969,007

Michael Graham		399,360		299,510		599,020		299,510

Stephan Pace		225,108		168,994		337,988		168,994

Craig Cappel		231,738		174,002		348,004		174,002

Rachel Bishop		205,998		154,508		309,016		154,508

Name	AIP Target Percentage (%)			Payment From Annual Incentive Plan ($)
Lance Mitchell		115	%		3,565,000
Michael Graham		60	%		975,233
Stephan Pace		60	%		549,698
Craig Cappel		60	%		565,934
Rachel Bishop		60	%		503,052


	2023 Annual PSUs				2023 Annual RSUs
	Grant Date Fair Value (Based on Probable Outcome)		Grant Date Fair Value (Based on Maximum Performance)		Grant Date Fair Value
Name	($)		($)		($)
Lance Mitchell		1,937,507		3,875,014		1,937,507

Scott Huckins		—		—		1,500,013

Rachel Bishop		365,169		730,338		365,169

Judith Buckner		354,382		708,764		354,382

Lisa Smith		337,485		674,970		337,515

Michael Graham		555,293		1,110,586		555,323


	2021 Annual PSUs				2021 Annual RSUs
	Grant Date Fair Value (Based on Probable Outcome)		Grant Date Fair Value (Based on Maximum Performance)		Grant Date Fair Value
Name	($)		($)		($)
Lance Mitchell		1,743,754		3,487,508		1,743,754

Rachel Bishop		281,258		562,516		281,258

Michael Graham		514,163		1,028,326		514,193

Name	2018 ($)		2018 %			2019 ($)		2019 %
Lance Mitchell		1,400,000		72	%		1,550,000		101	%
Michael Graham		564,650		72	%		581,590		101	%
Stephan Pace		318,270		72	%		327,818		101	%
Craig Cappel		287,799		72	%		337,500		101	%
Rachel Bishop		—		—			300,000		101	%

Name	Contributions To 401(k) Plan ($)		Contributions To Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan ($)
Lance Mitchell		22,800		142,200
Michael Graham		17,412		75,616
Stephan Pace		22,800		39,218
Craig Cappel		22,800		40,606
Rachel Bishop		22,541		32,530

			Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards⁽¹⁾						Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards
Name and Award Type	Grant Date	Date of CNG Committee Approval	Threshold ($)		Target ($)		Maximum ($)		Threshold (#)		Target (#)		Maximum (#)		All Other Stock Awards Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)⁽²⁾
Lance Mitchell
2020 AIP				445,625		1,782,500		3,565,000
IPO RSUs	2/4/2020	1/21/2020														59,615		1,549,990
LTI RSUs	3/5/2020	3/4/2020														32,311		969,007
LTI PSUs	3/5/2020	3/4/2020								16,156		32,311		64,622				969,007
Michael Graham
2020 AIP				121,904		487,616		975,233
IPO RSUs	2/4/2020	1/21/2020														15,360		399,360
LTI RSUs	3/5/2020	3/4/2020														9,987		299,510
LTI PSUs	3/5/2020	3/4/2020								4,994		9,987		19,974				299,510
Stephan Pace
2020 AIP				68,712		274,849		549,698
IPO RSUs	2/4/2020	1/21/2020														8,658		225,108
LTI RSUs	3/5/2020	3/4/2020														5,635		168,994
LTI PSUs	3/5/2020	3/4/2020								2,818		5,635		11,270				168,994
Craig Cappel
2020 AIP				70,742		282,967		565,934
IPO RSUs	2/4/2020	1/21/2020														8,913		231,738
LTI RSUs	3/5/2020	3/4/2020														5,802		174,002
LTI PSUs	3/5/2020	3/4/2020								2,901		5,802		11,604				174,002
Rachel Bishop
2020 AIP				62,882		251,526		503,052
IPO RSUs	2/4/2020	1/21/2020														7,923		205,998
LTI RSUs	3/5/2020	3/4/2020														5,152		154,508
LTI PSUs	3/5/2020	3/4/2020								2,576		5,152		10,304				154,508


Name	Executive Contributions in Last FY ($)⁽¹⁾		Company Contributions in Last FY ($)⁽²⁾		Aggregate Earnings in Last FY ($)			Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($)			Aggregate Balance at Last FYE ($)⁽³⁾
Lance Mitchell		306,900		142,200		(53,158	)		—			2,090,475
Michael Graham⁽⁴⁾		625,774		75,616		555,389			(242,775	)		5,257,858
Stephan Pace		302,334		39,218		146,657			—			1,134,448
Craig Cappel		84,890		40,607		50,872			—			439,341
Lance Mitchell
Lance Mitchell
Scott Huckins
Scott Huckins
Scott Huckins
Rachel Bishop		293,447		32,530		153,160			—			874,497
Rachel Bishop
Rachel Bishop
Judith Buckner
Judith Buckner
Judith Buckner
Lisa Smith
Lisa Smith
Lisa Smith
Michael Graham
Michael Graham
Michael Graham